This paper describes the problems and difficulties encountered in a current research project which is attempting to engage practitioners in the collection of data using standardized outcome measures. The aim of the research is to meet the demand for greater clarity about the services and, particularly, the therapeutic interventions delivered by family support practitioners, whilst maintaining a sensitivity to the family support services’ client group. The client group consists of children in need and vulnerable families who might often be described as “in crisis”. The paper explains the family support context and refers to the difficulties encountered by other researchers in this field. The methods and process of engaging practitioners in this research have not been widely used and are, perhaps without precedent. They are described in detail, as are both the reported and perceived problems which have become a research finding in their own right.
Article navigation
1 January 2003
Case Report|
January 01 2003
Practitioners as gatekeepers and researchers: family support outcomes Available to Purchase
Jillian Tidmarsh;
Jillian Tidmarsh
Centre for Applied Social Studies, University of Durham
Search for other works by this author on:
John Carpenter;
John Carpenter
Centre for Applied Social Studies, University of Durham
Search for other works by this author on:
John Slade
John Slade
Centre for Applied Social Studies, University of Durham
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6720
Print ISSN: 0144-333X
© MCB UP Limited
2003
International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy (2003) 23 (1-2): 59–79.
Citation
Tidmarsh J, Carpenter J, Slade J (2003), "Practitioners as gatekeepers and researchers: family support outcomes". International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 23 No. 1-2 pp. 59–79, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330310790462
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Making more research count: a blockchain enabled one-stop shop for immutable behavioral research
Foresight (August,2021)
The application of theory in literature reviews – illustrated with examples from supply chain management
International Journal of Operations & Production Management (November,2020)
Mind the gap: generative AI as a knowledge translator to address the theory-practice gap in supply chain management
International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management (May,2026)
Authentic leadership: the influence of work and non-work domain contextual factors
Leadership & Organization Development Journal (June,2019)
Exploring the use of electronic resources by humanities scholars during the research process
The Electronic Library (June,2019)
Related Chapters
The Beginning, Acting, Telling (Bat) Model: A Visual Framework for Teaching Digital Literacy through Inquiry and Information Seeking
Best Practices in Teaching Digital Literacies
Coming Alongside during the Dissertation Process: Living, Telling, Reliving, Retelling a Story of Being and Becoming a Narrative Inquirer
Landscapes, Edges, and Identity-Making: Narrative Examinations of Teacher Knowledge
Depicting the Intersection between Information-Seeking Behavior and Information Literacy in the Research Process: A Model
New Directions in Children’s and Adolescents’ Information Behavior Research
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
