A rather large literature argues that firms and households do not always improve energy efficiency by investing in new technology even if it would be cost effective to do so. In this paper, we review the theoretical and empirical literature on the so called energy efficiency gap and provide a rationale for policymakers to act to improve energy efficiency. By eliminating market failures, welfare can be improved in a broad sense, including both environmental quality and material welfare. We also discuss social 'nudges' as examples of policy instruments that do not directly target any market failure in energy markets but that still may have a significant impact on energy use. Although we acknowledge the existence of the energy efficiency gap, we argue that the gap in general is overestimated as parts of it can be explained by heterogeneity in preferences and thus explained by rational choices.
Article navigation
7 July 2015
Research Article|
July 07 2015
Inefficiencies in Residential Use of Energy 舒 A Critical Overview of Literature and Energy Efficiency Policies in the EU
Thomas Broberg;
Thomas Broberg
Centre for Environmental and Resource Economics
, Department of Economics, SE-90187, Umea, Sweden
Search for other works by this author on:
Andrius Kazukauskas
Andrius Kazukauskas
Centre for Environmental and Resource Economics
, Department of Economics, SE-90187, Umea, Sweden
Search for other works by this author on:
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Swedish Energy Agency. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the Swedish Energy Agency.
Online ISSN: 1932-1473
Print ISSN: 1932-1465
© 2015 T. Broberg and A. Kazukauskas
2015
T. Broberg and A. Kazukauskas
Licensed re-use rights only
International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics (2015) 8 (2): 225–279.
Citation
Broberg T, Kazukauskas A (2015), "Inefficiencies in Residential Use of Energy 舒 A Critical Overview of Literature and Energy Efficiency Policies in the EU". International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 8 No. 2 pp. 225–279, doi: https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000070
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Subjective satisfaction and objective electricity poverty reduction in Vietnam, 2008–2018
Fulbright Review of Economics and Policy (July,2021)
On the welfare effect of retail electricity subsidy in Vietnam
Journal of Economics and Development (August,2023)
Related Chapters
An Index Proposal for Supply Security Risk in Fossil Energy Imports: The Case of Turkey
New Challenges for Future Sustainability and Wellbeing
Effective Radioactive Waste Management Strategies in Nuclear Energy Investments for Environmental Sustainability
International Trade, Economic Crisis and the Sustainable Development Goals
Convergence Analysis of Energy Consumption in the G-20 Economies
Changing Dimensions in Economic Development: Theories and Empirics
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
