Skip to Main Content
Article navigation
Purpose

This study examines the implementation of fully remote auditing to explore the implications on audit evidence collection procedures and the quality thereof, and the impact on audit quality.

Design/methodology/approach

A total of 22 in-depth interviews were conducted with professional auditors in China during the COVID-19 pandemic, to ascertain their perceptions of the quality of audit evidence that relied heavily on remote auditing procedures.

Findings

The results suggests that remote auditing has led to a decline in the quantity and quality of audit evidence collected, and a subsequent decline in audit quality. The findings also suggest that the notion of audit quality is not fixed, but a flexible concept sitting at different points on a continuum adjusted for the context in which audit evidence is collected.

Originality/value

This study represents an early attempt to understand the implications on audit quality from remote auditing, moving research beyond a descriptive analysis of the technology used in remote auditing or its benefits.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal