Skip to Main Content
Article navigation

Papers of this type take a deal of work and considerable thought (Gibbons and Fanning, 2012). The authors are to be thanked for their efforts.

The contributor wishes to take issue with two statements they make before raising his main point. In Section 2.2.2 the authors state that the Ring program (which is not the contributor's), being based on the formation of four plastic hinges, can be considered as an upper bound solution. This is a misreading of the plastic theorems. Ring satisfies both the mechanism and the equilibrium conditions, and indeed as it considers material strength, the...

You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal