London Underground (LU) has a large civil engineering asset portfolio of which bridges comprise approximately 8000 assets. The LU system, which was constructed by various private railway companies commencing in the early 1860s, continues to provide service today, with some bridges having therefore been in use for over 150 years. As a variety of railway companies were used for the bridge constructions, diverse designs exist across the LU network. Many record drawings have been destroyed over the years as part of space-saving initiatives and others lost during mergers and takeovers of the various railway companies. Furthermore, in the early 1980s LU lacked formal engineering standards and procedures for the effective asset management of its bridge stock. It was therefore decided to embark upon an assessment project to determine the extent, condition and load-carrying capacity of the company's bridges and structures. This paper will describe how pioneering inspection and assessment standards were devised. It will progress to outline the bridge assessment strategy, the formulation of a risk management system to address non-compliant bridges and how the final assessment results have enabled maintenance and capacity improvement works to be prioritised (Figure 1) to ensure that the LU railway delivers a safe, efficient and reliable service.
Article navigation
June 2016
Research Article|
February 16 2016
London Underground – successful outcome of bridge assessment programme
Richard McKoy, IEng, AMIStuct E
Richard McKoy, IEng, AMIStuct E
STEW/Assessment Manager
London Underground, London, UK (Richard.Mckoy1@tube.tfl.gov.uk)
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
March 31 2015
Accepted:
January 08 2016
Online ISSN: 1751-7664
Print ISSN: 1478-4637
ICE Publishing: All rights reserved
2016
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Bridge Engineering (2016) 169 (2): 113–125.
Article history
Received:
March 31 2015
Accepted:
January 08 2016
Citation
McKoy R (2016), "London Underground – successful outcome of bridge assessment programme". Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Bridge Engineering, Vol. 169 No. 2 pp. 113–125, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/jbren.15.00013
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Book review
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Bridge Engineering (June,2004)
Editorial
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Bridge Engineering (September,2014)
Erratum: Buffeting reliability of bridges with structural uncertainties
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Bridge Engineering (June,2015)
Foreword
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Bridge Engineering (March,2003)
Discussion: An integral composite bridge of high skew
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Bridge Engineering (March,2004)
Related Chapters
Tension cables in suspension bridges. A case of form-finding
Tension Structures: Form and behaviour
Introduction
Bridge Construction Equipment
Lord Hill’s Bridge Mitigation Works
Crossrail Project: Infrastructure Design and Construction
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
