Skip to Main Content
Article navigation
Purpose

The purpose of this work is to identify the components of authentic communication with LGBTQ publics and to examine if there is a difference in what constitutes authentic communication for LGBTQ publics compared to other publics.

Design/methodology/approach

We conducted in-depth interviews with professionals who both identify as LGBTQ and are instrumental in developing content targeted to this public.

Findings

Authenticity is synonymous regardless of the target public; however, differences emerge in the manifestation of authenticity with historically marginalized groups, like LGBTQ publics.

Practical implications

Practitioners working with historically marginalized communities need to make sure they are walking the walk, not just talking the talk.

Social implications

Authentic communication arises from an organization's broader holistic commitments to diversity, equity and inclusion.

Originality/value

The insights derived by our participants are unique, as they are perspectives traditionally “written out” of research.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal