In this paper the extent to which modern indexing and information retrieval research meets the needs and requirements of different types of readers is criticised. A review of the stagnation in this field gives evidence for the need for a radically different approach. The main problem is identified as the assumption that knowledge contained in a scientific article can be represented by a semantic network only, and therefore can be manipulated by formal logic approaches. Complementary to this, a plea is made to start an argumentational analysis of the — highly structured — corpus of scientific articles (mainly in physics). Such an analysis might lead to an argumentational syntax which will also enable the non‐expert to browse through large quantities of electronically stored articles. A first attempt at such an approach is given. Furthermore the possible use of the Standard General Markup Language (sgml) approach in relation to a hypertext environment for a possible application is discussed.
Article navigation
1 April 1991
Review Article|
April 01 1991
RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES: THE CASE FOR ARGUMENTATIONAL ANALYSIS IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL
JOOST G. KIRCZ
JOOST G. KIRCZ
Elsevier Science Publishers, PO Box 103, 1000 AC Amsterdam
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7379
Print ISSN: 0022-0418
© MCB UP Limited
1991
Journal of Documentation (1991) 47 (4): 354–372.
Citation
KIRCZ JG (1991), "RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES: THE CASE FOR ARGUMENTATIONAL ANALYSIS IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL". Journal of Documentation, Vol. 47 No. 4 pp. 354–372, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026884
Download citation file:
Related Chapters
Sources and Further Reading
The Emerald Guide to Zygmunt Bauman
THE WELDING OF ALLOY 800 -A Review
A Status Review of Alloy 800: Proceedings of a British Nuclear Energy Society Conference at the University of Reading on 25 and 26 September 1974
Zygmunt Bauman bibliography
The Emerald Guide to Zygmunt Bauman
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
