Skip to Main Content
Corrigendum| September 01 2021

Corrigendum Free

Author & Article Information
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1756-8404
Print ISSN: 1368-1494
ICE Publishing: All rights reserved
2021
Dams and Reservoirs (2021) 31 (3): 123–124.
https://doi.org/10.1680/jdare.2021.31.3.123

Pucknell S, Kjeldsen TR, Haxton T, Jeans J and Young AR (2020) Estimating the probable maximum flood in UK catchments using the ReFH model. Dams and Reservoirs 30(3): 85–90, https://doi.org/10.1680/jdare.20.00015.

The authors have identified that the estimated summer model parameters and subsequent final summer results reported were incorrect. Accordingly, the relevant figures and tables have been updated (see below). These changes do not have an appreciable impact on the final results hence no changes to the text or conclusions of the study are necessary.

ICE Publishing: All rights reserved
2021
data&figures
Data & Figures
 contents
Contents
 supplements
Supplements
 references
References
 related
Related
 languages
Languages

Data & Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Refer to the image caption for details.
View largeDownload slide

(corrected). Observed and predicted values of CPMFini/Cini plotted as a function of Cmax for 15 catchments (winter and summer)

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Refer to the image caption for details.
View largeDownload slide

(corrected). Observed and predicted values of CPMFini/Cini plotted as a function of Cmax for 15 catchments (winter and summer)

Close modal
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Refer to the image caption for details.
View largeDownload slide

(corrected). Comparison of PMF as estimated by the ReFH2 model (y-axis) and the FSR/FEH method (x-axis) for both summer (triangle) and winter (circle) events. ReFH2.3 results are presented for comparison.

Figure 2.
Figure 2. Refer to the image caption for details.
View largeDownload slide

(corrected). Comparison of PMF as estimated by the ReFH2 model (y-axis) and the FSR/FEH method (x-axis) for both summer (triangle) and winter (circle) events. ReFH2.3 results are presented for comparison.

Close modal
Table 3.

(corrected). Estimated model parameters for Equation 4

SummerWinter
abab
Incl. outlier0.91641.11030.55223.2205
Excl. outlier0.984520.88490.63392.8515
View large
Table 4.

(corrected). Estimates of summer and winter PMF obtained from ReFH2.2 and the FSR/FEH models for all 15 test catchments

CatchmentReFH2 PMF: m3/sReFH2 PMF SeasonSummer event as % of PMFWinter event as % of PMFFSR PMF: m3/sFSR PMF Season
Loch Craisg9.7S1006810.4S
Little Denny9.4S1007312.5S
Loch Gleann17.7S1008715.51W
Parkhill House5.0S100868.4S
Leperstone13.4W7310017.8S
Higher Naden71.3S1009475.6S
Lower Carriston23.0S1007633.9S
Nanpantan58.7S1004740.9S
Upper Neuadd129.1S10091133.3S
Crafnant96.7W9610095.1S
Usk244.9S10089217.4S
Colt Crag229.9S10049127.2S
Loch Kirbister145.6S10070133.2S
Staunton Harold178.8S10066166.4S
Roadford411.0S10080377.8S
View large

Contents

Volume 31, Issue 3
September 2021
Dams and Reservoirs Cover Image for Volume 31, Issue 3

Supplements

References

Related

265 Views
View Metrics

Suggested Reading

Estimating the probable maximum flood in UK catchments using the ReFH model
Dams and Reservoirs (October,2020)

Recommended for you

These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.

Cited By

Google Scholar

Languages

  • Online ISSN 1756-8404
  • Print ISSN 1368-1494
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal