People are starting to doubt business recovery in office market after global financial crisis in 2008. And most institutional and individual portfolios are undiversified in real estate : incurring enormous transaction costs than other financial products. Especially office market has more risks than other real estate market for high transaction costs and many related industries. Although this stuff can lead to increase the risk of investment in office market, nor are there markets that would allow individuals and institutions to hedge their risks. The establishment of office price index future and option markets is likely to hedge away large risk in office market, and provides lowering transaction costs for trading in real estate. We estimate Office Price Index using S&P/Case-Shiller repeat sale estimator which is proposed by Robert. J. Shiller in 1991. The estimator is a sort of Feasible Generalized Two Stage Least Squares, which compute Value weighted Arithmetic Price Index.
Research Article|
November 30 2011
Office Price Index for Derivative Using S&P/Case-Shiller Estimator Open Access
Chang Moo Lee
Chang Moo Lee
Hanyang University
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing on behalf of Korea Derivatives Association
Online ISSN: 2713-6647
Print ISSN: 1229-988X
© 2011 Emerald Publishing Limited
2011
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
Journal of Derivatives and Quantitative Studies: Seonmul yeon’gu (2011) 19 (4): 363–387.
Citation
Ryu KM, Park SH, Lee CM (2011), "Office Price Index for Derivative Using S&P/Case-Shiller Estimator". Journal of Derivatives and Quantitative Studies: Seonmul yeon’gu, Vol. 19 No. 4 pp. 363–387, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JDQS-04-2011-B0002
Download citation file:
