Skip to Main Content
Article navigation
Purpose

Psychological distress is a growing concern in the construction industry, yet its relationship with work performance remains poorly investigated. Most existing studies assume a linear and negative association, overlooking the potential complexity of this relationship. This study aims to investigate the relationship between psychological distress and work performance, with a focus on the Vietnamese construction context.

Design/methodology/approach

A total of 422 valid responses were collected using a snowball sampling approach. Several machine learning (ML) algorithms were applied to explore the relationship between psychological distress and work performance.

Findings

Gaussian Process Regression was the most robust approach (RMSE = 0.3892, MAE = 0.2842, MASE = 1.2172, R2 = 0.8481). The analysis revealed an inverted U-shaped relationship consistent with the Yerkes–Dodson law. Specifically, work performance improved under mild psychological distress but declined beyond a threshold of 8.75.

Originality/value

The results underscore the importance of understanding and managing distress to remain productive. The study highlights that work performance improves with mild distress, but begins to decline sharply when psychological distress passes a certain level. These findings suggest that employees should not try to eliminate all distress, but instead focus on keeping distress at a healthy level.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal