Award-winning paper in 2022

The Telford Premium Prize, presented for the best paper published in Engineering History and Heritage, was awarded to Grant et al. (2022).

Seismic risk mitigation in existing buildings requires an engineering assessment of the current condition and expected seismic performance and an identification of possible deficiencies that should be addressed. For heritage and historical buildings in particular, there is significant benefit in using the most detailed analysis methods available to avoid the conservatism inherent in simpler methods and thereby minimise unnecessary interventions and more precisely pinpoint where strengthening is required. On recent heritage projects, Arup has used the analysis software LS-DYNA and a new material model, calibrated against experimental tests on unreinforced masonry components and buildings to carry out (or supplement) seismic assessments. The analysis method (non-linear response history analysis) is not new, but its application on detailed finite-element models of complex historic structures has previously been computationally prohibitive and requires significant analyst experience to deliver reliable results. This paper summarises three of these recent Arup projects: Woltersum Church (the Netherlands), Procuratie Vecchie (Venice) and a building cluster in the historical centre of Appingedam (the Netherlands). The case studies show that these analyses allow complex features of seismic performance to be considered, such as damage or modifications to the building over time, pounding (separate buildings colliding into one another due to seismic movements) and load sharing between adjacent structures.