The controversy between Hayek and Keynes in the 1930s is probably one of the best‐known disputes in economics and several comments have been made on this episode (Hicks, 1967; Machlup, 1977; Fletcher, 1987). In the assessments little attention has been paid to the development of the ideas of the two economists, to the views they had in common and to the influence they had on each other. These aspects will be taken into consideration in this contribution with the aim of extending our knowledge of the fundamental points of disagreement between them. The crucial question is how it came about that Hayek and Keynes, who for some time studied very similar monetary problems, ended as such fierce opponents on the question of how a modern capitalist system works. Keynes went as far as denying that the market system is self‐adjusting, whereas Hayek, especially in his later writings, propounded the view that markets constitute an efficient mechanism for the satisfaction of human needs.
Article navigation
1 March 1988
Review Article|
March 01 1988
Hayek and Keynes: A Comparative Analysis of Their Monetary Views Available to Purchase
A. Nentjes
A. Nentjes
University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7387
Print ISSN: 0144-3585
© MCB UP Limited
1988
Journal of Economic Studies (1988) 15 (3-4): 136–151.
Citation
Nentjes A (1988), "Hayek and Keynes: A Comparative Analysis of Their Monetary Views". Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 15 No. 3-4 pp. 136–151, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb002676
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
From Austrian theory of capital to dissent: Nicholas Kaldor, Friedrich A. Hayek and the way to disequilibrium
EconomiA (April,2023)
The development of Professor Hayek’s research programme
International Journal of Social Economics (June,1995)
The development of Professor Hayek′s research programme
International Journal of Social Economics (February,1995)
Antecedents to the crisis: Mandeville, Smith, and Keynes
International Journal of Social Economics (November,2018)
Defining fundamental disequilibrium: Keynes's unheeded contribution
Journal of Economic Studies (October,2003)
Related Chapters
“Un-Austrian” Austrians? Haberler, Machlup, and Morgenstern, and the Post-Emigration Elaboration of Austrian Economics
Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology
What Can We Learn about Frank Knight’s Economic Theory from the Prefaces to the Reprints of Risk, Uncertainty and Profit?
Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology: Including a Symposium on Frank Knight's Risk, Uncertainty and Profit at 100
Collective and individual rationality: Maynard Keynes' methodological standpoint and policy prescription
Confronting 9-11, Ideologies of Race, and Eminent Economists
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
