In most jurisdictions a suspect has the right to remain silent during criminal proceedings and he cannot be penalised for making false statements. This is loosely known as the ‘ban on self incrimination’ and is regarded as an important factor in due process protection of individuals subject to criminal proceedings. The right to silence applies only to the stage of criminal proceedings, and up to date it has surprisingly not been seriously debated. A criminal may have caused individuals and society major loss, damage or suffering; in principle one would expect that he would be obliged to assist in the clearing‐up of the case, particularly if this could ameliorate or repair the negative consequences of the crime. But this is not the way it is looked at. The suspect is under pressure, and must not be faced with the choice of lying or confessing.
Article navigation
1 April 1997
Review Article|
April 01 1997
The Ban on Self Incrimination after the Saunders Judgment Available to Purchase
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7239
Print ISSN: 1359-0790
© MCB UP Limited
1997
Journal of Financial Crime (1997) 5 (2): 182–189.
Citation
Eriksen M, Thorkildsen T (1997), "The Ban on Self Incrimination after the Saunders Judgment". Journal of Financial Crime, Vol. 5 No. 2 pp. 182–189, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb025832
Download citation file:
177
Views
Suggested Reading
Australia: The Privilege against Self‐Incrimination: Recent Developments
Journal of Financial Crime (January,1998)
Self‐incrimination: Recent Developments
Journal of Financial Crime (March,1996)
Australia: The Privilege Against Self‐incrimination in Australian Civil Proceedings — The Decision in Reid v Howard
Journal of Financial Crime (February,1996)
More Sounds of Silence: Cobra Golf Ltd v Rata
Journal of Financial Crime (April,1997)
THE PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF‐INCRIMINATION
The International Journal of Regulatory Law & Practice (January,1992)
Related Chapters
The Crown Witness and the Protection of Human Rights in Criminal Law Verification
Proceedings of MICoMS 2017
2. The psyshology of judgement
Engineering judgement and risk
Evolution of Entrepreneurial Judgment
Advancing European Entrepreneurship Research: Entrepreneurship as a Working Attitude, a Mode of Thinking and an Everyday Practice
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
