The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has been provided with the statutory authority to demand the attendance of suspects at its offices and also to demand that information is supplied, irrespective of whether or not the suspect has been charged with a criminal offence. It has been held that the provisions of Art. 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) do protect the defendant from self‐incrimination, and the UK government has been successfully challenged at the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) over these issues. The powers conferred on the SFO remain in place, but these must now be viewed in the context of the Human Rights Act 1998, which became law in the UK in October 2000; unless the powers of the SFO are reviewed by Parliament, it would seem to be the courts who will take responsibility in the UK for ensuring that the rights of suspects are upheld.
Article navigation
1 April 2001
Review Article|
April 01 2001
Human Rights and the Restructuring of Financial Services Regulation in the UK Available to Purchase
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7239
Print ISSN: 1359-0790
© MCB UP Limited
2001
Journal of Financial Crime (2001) 9 (2): 179–190.
Citation
Johnstone P, Haines J (2001), "Human Rights and the Restructuring of Financial Services Regulation in the UK". Journal of Financial Crime, Vol. 9 No. 2 pp. 179–190, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026017
Download citation file:
184
Views
Suggested Reading
The impact of the European court of human rights on the development of rights in health care
International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare (October,2021)
Self‐incrimination: Recent Developments
Journal of Financial Crime (March,1996)
Satire and rights: legal challenges under the ECHR and the DSA
Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society (September,2025)
Collection of assets into state income: unique Ukrainian measure as seen from the perspective of human rights and fair trial standards
Journal of International Trade Law and Policy (April,2026)
Related Chapters
13 Inquests
A guide to health and safety prosecutions
Caught between a Rock and a Hard Place – Human Rights, Life Imprisonment and Gender Stereotyping: A Critical Analysis of Khamtokhu and Aksenchik v. Russia (2017)
The Emerald Handbook of Feminism, Criminology and Social Change
The Collateral Consequence Conundrum: Comparative Genealogy, Current Trends, and Future Scenarios
After Imprisonment: Special Issue
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
