Skip to Main Content
Article navigation

Forest management planning comprises multiple products, goods, and services and is characterized by multiple conflicting interests. Thus, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) immediately suggests itself. However, reports on MCDM seem to be dispersed. It is attempted to provide a generally accepted metaphor, to increase the understanding of, to relate MCDM to traditional methods, and to suggest a ranking of the methods with respect to beneficial use within forest management planning. It is concluded that MCDM methods, with focus on duality values, comprise great prospects for application to multiple-use forestry, alleviating some of the shortcomings associated with the traditional “one-criterion” management paradigm.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal