We use a large unique household panel dataset spanning 16 years to estimate the impacts of three Key Priority Forestry Programs (the KPFPs) in China on household incomes. The programs are the most significant of China’s forest policies namely the Sloping Land Conversion Program (the SLCP), the Natural Forest Protection Program (the NFPP), and the Desertification Combating Program around Beijing and Tianjin (the DCBT). A fixed effect model with clustered standard errors is used to identify programs’ impacts based on variation in participation across households and time. In addition to estimating the total impacts of these programs, individually and in combination, we disaggregate the effects by income source, stage of policy implementation, and duration of participation. Overall, the impacts of the KPFPs on rural households’ income vary with time of enrollment and policy stage. We observe that the KPFPs in their initial stages of implementation, and for the early years of household participation, had negative, or at best neutral impacts on household incomes, in particular incomes from land. However, the later stages of the SLCP and the DCBT have tended to raise land-based incomes, and the NFPP has ceased to have a negative effect. This is likely to be in part the result of adjustments made by rural households over time in response to changes in the programs, as well as in market and environmental conditions.
Article navigation
1 August 2014
Research Article|
August 01 2014
The estimation of long term impacts of China’s key priority forestry programs on rural household incomes
Can Liu;
Can Liu
*
a
Economics and Management College, Northwest Agricultural and Forestry University
, Shaanxi 712100, China
c
China National Forestry Economics and Development Research Center
, Beijing 100714, China
*Corresponding author at: China National Forestry Economics and Development Research Center, Beijing 100714, China. Tel.: +86 13161268950.
Search for other works by this author on:
Katrina Mullan;
Katrina Mullan
b
Economics Department at the University of Montana
, Missoula, MT 59812-5472, United States
Search for other works by this author on:
Hao Liu;
Hao Liu
c
China National Forestry Economics and Development Research Center
, Beijing 100714, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Wenqing Zhu;
Wenqing Zhu
d
China Agricultural University
, Beijing 100083, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Qingjiao Rong
Qingjiao Rong
a
Economics and Management College, Northwest Agricultural and Forestry University
, Shaanxi 712100, China
Search for other works by this author on:
*Corresponding author at: China National Forestry Economics and Development Research Center, Beijing 100714, China. Tel.: +86 13161268950.
Received:
June 26 2013
Accepted:
August 26 2014
Online ISSN: 1618-1530
Print ISSN: 1104-6899
© 2014 Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå. Published by Elsevier GmbH
2014
Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå. Published by Elsevier GmbH
Licensed re-use rights only
Journal of Forest Economics (2014) 20 (3): 267–285.
Article history
Received:
June 26 2013
Accepted:
August 26 2014
Citation
Liu C, Mullan K, Liu H, Zhu W, Rong Q (2014), "The estimation of long term impacts of China’s key priority forestry programs on rural household incomes". Journal of Forest Economics, Vol. 20 No. 3 pp. 267–285, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2014.08.001
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Determinants of repayment performance of group lending in China: Evidence from rural credit cooperatives' program in Guizhou province
China Agricultural Economic Review (August,2013)
Transportation infrastructure and rural development in China
China Agricultural Economic Review (September,2016)
How much did the return of rural migrant labor affect China's national economy?
China Agricultural Economic Review (January,2014)
Steadying the ladder: China's agricultural and rural development engagement in Africa
China Agricultural Economic Review (January,2014)
Rural-urban income gap and agricultural growth in China: An empirical study on the provincial panel data, 1978-2010
China Agricultural Economic Review (January,2014)
Related Chapters
Rural Development: Actors and Practices
Constructing a New Framework for Rural Development
Addressing Rural Social Exclusion in the Developing World: Exploring the Role of African Social Purpose Ventures
Exploring Rural Enterprise: New Perspectives On Research, Policy & Practice
Were Five Years Wasted?: Exploring Rural Education in Trinidad and Tobago
Effects of Government Mandates and Policies on Public Education in Africa, the Caribbean, and the Middle East
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
