Design reviewing is an important aspect of engineering design. Designs certified by a professional engineer require some form of external check. This external check can range from a quick intuitive assessment of a proposed solution to a reassessment of the problem using alternative methods. This research explored intuitive review assessments for two typical geotechnical designs. The results suggest that those with requisite experience (even seemingly little experience) can make correct assessments even after spending as few as 4 min reviewing a carefully presented solution. Forcing participants to state reasons for a decision (and thereby slowing them down) only served to improve predictions by novices attempting an unfamiliar problem. While such quick intuitive reviews appeared adequate for assessing the problems presented here, some experts still made erroneous decisions even after stating reasons for a decision. Design reviews are an important step in design and should never be taken lightly.
Article navigation
17 November 2022
Research Article|
November 17 2022
Design reviewing: are experts better and does slowing down improve performance?
Charles John MacRobert, PhD, PrEng
Department of Civil Engineering, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
May 31 2022
Accepted:
October 18 2022
Online ISSN: 2043-9911
Print ISSN: 2043-9903
ICE Publishing: All rights reserved
2023
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Forensic Engineering (2022) 176 (2): 54–61.
Article history
Received:
May 31 2022
Accepted:
October 18 2022
Citation
MacRobert CJ (2022), "Design reviewing: are experts better and does slowing down improve performance?". Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Forensic Engineering, Vol. 176 No. 2 pp. 54–61, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/jfoen.22.00013
Download citation file:
1,012
Views
Suggested Reading
Snakeskin-inspired patterns for frictional anisotropic behaviour of split set rock bolts
Geotechnique Letters (March,2022)
A simplified settlement prediction method for piled rafts in clay
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Geotechnical Engineering (April,2022)
Review of the XVIII European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Geotechnical Engineering (May,2025)
Editorial
Geotechnical Research (September,2014)
Editorial
Geotechnical Research (March,2015)
Related Chapters
Probabilistic limiting tolerable displacements for serviceability limit state design of foundations
Risk and Variability in Geotechnical Engineering
Partial factors calibration based on reliability analyses for square footings on granular soils
Risk and Variability in Geotechnical Engineering
Reliability-based design applied to retaining walls
Risk and Variability in Geotechnical Engineering
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
