This study aims to explore the potential impact of applying the Power Threat Meaning Framework (PTMF), to develop a collaborative formulation with those serving Indeterminate Sentences for Public Protection (IPP), where there have been serious concerns with sentence progression.
Given little research has focused on the utility of the PTMF with this cohort, a case study approach was adopted. Participants developed a formulation, discussing their experience of serving an IPP sentence with the opportunity to share their formulation with supervising professionals. Notes were recorded including: participants’ comments, researcher’s observations and professionals’ feedback. The data was analysed using thematic analysis.
Four themes were developed: “Insight”, “Working alliance”, “Gives ‘power’ back” and “Motivation”, including some sub-themes. These findings provide some support for the use of the PTMF with this cohort.
The small number of participants mean the findings cannot be generalised to the wider IPP cohort. This study indicates that using a PTMF formulation approach to discuss the impact of the IPP sentence, in a manner that mitigates the power imbalance between professionals and prisoners, has the potential to improve engagement and working alliance.
The current study sought to add to the limited literature focusing on the use of the PTMF with unreleased IPPs on a one-to-one basis. The findings act as a foundation for future research exploring the use of the PTMF more widely within custodial settings.
