Skip to Main Content
Article navigation
Purpose

This paper aims to explore Switzerland’s export restriction laws, focusing on export controls and sanctions, with particular attention to the reporting obligations placed on financial institutions. It aims to assess how Switzerland’s anti-money laundering (AML) and countering the financing of terrorism (CFT) legal framework supports the enforcement of export restrictions. Furthermore, the article examines the legal uncertainties surrounding financial institutions’ AML/CFT reporting in relation to export-restriction cases and evaluates the overall effectiveness of the system in ensuring the enforcement of export restrictions.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper conducts reviews of primary and secondary sources and current developments.

Findings

The article finds that Swiss financial institutions, with one minor exception, do not have direct reporting obligations under export restriction legislation, unlike the European Union’s broader sanctions regime against Russia. Instead, enforcement relies on AML/CFT reporting obligations, which obligate financial institutions to identify potential violations of export restrictions. However, legal uncertainty and a lack of jurisprudence create challenges in defining what constitutes a “serious case” under the Swiss export restriction legislation, complicating compliance efforts. The complexity of export restrictions adds further burdens on financial institutions’ compliance officers, who must navigate intricate legal frameworks and technical details. Despite these challenges, Swiss AML/CFT legislation provides legal protections for reporting institutions and facilitates cooperation between MROS, the Swiss financial intelligence unit, and SECO, the Swiss export restriction enforcement authority. However, operational inefficiencies within MROS hinder the effectiveness of this reporting mechanism, which ultimately renders the AML/CFT reporting obligation for financial institutions ineffective in the enforcement of export restrictions.

Originality/value

In the absence of scholarly articles on the topic, this article addresses a gap in academic research.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal