The audit function is an essential part of the regulatory structure which supports the integrity of our capital markets. There is a recognised expectations gap which surrounds the audit function, as many users of audited financial statements have different expectations of the audit function from what it delivers. Perceptions of auditor independence are a fundamental part of this expectations gap. In the light of recent significant changes to the regulatory framework, this paper reports a survey of leading financial journalists, to ascertain their current views on auditor independence. Findings show a belief that some of the changes have reduced the expectations gap although problems still exist in the area of non‐audit services. However, the most significant threat to independence is seen to be the economic and personal pressure on the partner as an individual, an area difficult to regulate. The challenge for audit firms is to demonstrate how well they control for this within their management structures.
Article navigation
1 February 1998
Review Article|
February 01 1998
Auditor independence and the expectations gap: Some evidence of changing user perceptions
Vivien Beattie;
Vivien Beattie
Department of Accountancy and Finance, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland
Search for other works by this author on:
Richard Brandt;
Richard Brandt
Department of Accounting and Management Science, University of Portsmouth, Locksway Road, Portsmouth, Hants
Search for other works by this author on:
Stella Fearnley
Stella Fearnley
Department of Accounting and Management Science, University of Portsmouth, Locksway Road, Portsmouth, Hants
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1740-0279
Print ISSN: 1358-1988
© MCB UP Limited
1998
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance (1998) 6 (2): 159–170.
Citation
Beattie V, Brandt R, Fearnley S (1998), "Auditor independence and the expectations gap: Some evidence of changing user perceptions". Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Vol. 6 No. 2 pp. 159–170, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb024966
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Problems and politics of regulatory fragmentation: The case of the Financial Reporting Review Panel and the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance (January,2000)
We’re off to see the wizard : An evaluation of directors’ and auditors’ experiences with the Financial Reporting Review Panel
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal (March,2001)
Enforcing compliance with accounting standards: The role of the Financial Reporting Review Panel in the UK regulatory framework
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance (April,1999)
Perceptions of auditor independence in Barbados
Managerial Auditing Journal (July,2006)
Auditor independence: an international perspective
Managerial Auditing Journal (December,1997)
Related Chapters
The Contested Concept of Auditor Independence
Independent Accounts
Examining Audit Relations: A Reconsideration of Auditor Independence
Independent Accounts
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
