The claimant, Mr Fleurose had been employed by JP Morgan Securities Ltd, a member of the Securities and Futures Authority (SFA), as a senior cash arbitrage trader. The London Stock Exchange (LSE) carried out an investigation into allegations that, on 28th November, 1997 he had, acting with his immediate superior, manipulated the FTSE 100 index in order to ensure that JP Morgan Ltd did not have to make a payment under a binary option. Under the terms of the option JP Morgan Ltd would have had to pay out if both the FTSE 100 Index and the Standard & Poors (S&P) Index were higher at the end of the month than at the beginning. On 28th November, the final day of trading, the S&P Index was significantly higher than its opening level but the FTSE 100 index was near the critical level at or below which JP Morgan Ltd would be relieved of its obligation to pay approximately £475,000 under the option. The applicant entered a wave of automated ‘sell’ orders in stocks in the leading five companies of the FTSE 100 list in the final eight minutes of trading of 28th November. The total value of those orders amounted to £11,247,525 and the ‘sell’ orders entered in the final six seconds of trading were at stated prices well below the market levels at the time. The FTSE 100 Index reacted by falling below the critical level. An immediate investigation into the sudden late fall in the Index was launched by the London Stock Exchange which attributed it to trading activity by JP Morgan Ltd. The firm conducted its own investigation and acknowledged that it had, through the activities of the Equity Derivatives Trading group (Mr Fleurose's group) breached Rule 2.10 of the London Stock Exchange Rules which prohibited member firms from doing an act or engaging in a course of conduct with the sole intention of moving the Index value. The firm was fined £350,000 by the London Stock Exchange. Mr Fleurose himself was not subject to the disciplinary jurisdiction of the London Stock Exchange but he was to that of the Securities and Futures Authority (SFA) as one of its Registered Representatives, along with his immediate superior.
Article navigation
1 April 2001
Review Article|
April 01 2001
R (on the application of Fleurose) v Securities and Futures Authority Ltd and another
Joanna Gray
Joanna Gray
University of Northumbria at Newcastle, School of Law, Sutherland Building, College Street, Newcastle upon Tyne
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1740-0279
Print ISSN: 1358-1988
© MCB UP Limited
2001
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance (2001) 9 (4): 373–380.
Citation
Morrison J, Gray J (2001), "R (on the application of Fleurose) v Securities and Futures Authority Ltd and another". Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Vol. 9 No. 4 pp. 373–380, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb025090
Download citation file:
171
Views
Suggested Reading
Claimants' view of the performance of adjudication in new South Wales
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management (September,2008)
Mahon and another v Rahn and others: High Court, Queen's Bench Division: Eady J
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance (January,2000)
An international analysis of time varying beta risk in listed real estate securities
Journal of Property Investment & Finance (March,2017)
Forecasting Islamic equity indices alpha
International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management (September,2020)
Behavioural insights into benefits claimants’ training
Education + Training (November,2017)
Related Chapters
Sustainability Reporting Practices in FTSE 100 Companies
The Sustainability Debate: Policies, Gender and the Media
An Analysis of Stock Participation Accreting Redemption Quarterly-Pay Securities
Research in Finance
The Evolution of Leadership Styles in the South China Sea: Contextual Factors and Shifting Approaches in China and the United States
Asian Leadership in Policy and Governance
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
