This paper describes the interaction behaviour of soil/geogrid and soil/concrete interfaces of a reinforced soil-retaining wall system under monotonic and cyclic loading conditions. A sand-clay mixture was tested with geogrids, which were manufactured from polyester and polyvinyl alcohol, and with concrete mortar in a modified direct shear device. In the cyclic tests, a total of 15 loading cycles or more were applied under constant displacement and by controlling the shear stress at a level of 56–74% of the monotonic shear strength. The test results showed that the strength of soil/geogrid interfaces was not affected significantly by cyclic loadings. At the end of cyclic loading, a larger stiffness and stress was mobilised in the reloading curve owing to the quasi-preconsolidated behaviour of the sand–clay mixture. For the soil/concrete interfaces, the interaction behaviour was different between the fresh and used (polished) specimens: significant strength reduction of up to 30% occurred in the used concrete specimens compared with the corresponding fresh specimens. The limited test results suggest that interface shear strengths obtained from monotonic loading may be relevant for designing reinforced soil-retaining walls subjected to earthquake loading.
Article navigation
2008
Research Article|
January 01 2008
Cyclic behaviour of soil-structure interfaces associated with modular-block reinforced soil-retaining walls Available to Purchase
H. I. Ling;
H. I. Ling
1
Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Columbia University
500 West 120th Street, New York, NY 10027, USA
Telephone: +1 212 854 1203, Telefax: +1–212–854–6267, E-mail: Ling@civil.columbia.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
J.-P. Wang;
J.-P. Wang
2
Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Columbia University
500 West 120th Street, New York, NY 10027, USA
Telephone: +1 212 854 3153, Telefax: +1 212 854 6267, E-mail: jw2174@.columbia.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
D. Leshchinsky
D. Leshchinsky
3
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Delaware
Newark, DE 19716, USA
Telephone: +1 302 831 2446, Telefax: +1 302 831 3640, E-mail: dov@.ce.udel.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
May 14 2007
Revision Received:
November 24 2007
Accepted:
November 24 2007
Online ISSN: 1751-7613
Print ISSN: 1072-6349
© 2008 Thomas Telford Ltd
2008
Geosynthetics International (2008) 15 (1): 14–21.
Article history
Received:
May 14 2007
Revision Received:
November 24 2007
Accepted:
November 24 2007
Citation
Ling HI, Wang J, Leshchinsky D (2008), "Cyclic behaviour of soil-structure interfaces associated with modular-block reinforced soil-retaining walls". Geosynthetics International, Vol. 15 No. 1 pp. 14–21, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2008.15.1.14
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Geogrid pullout behaviour according to the experimental evaluation of the active length
Geosynthetics International (December,2015)
Simplified approach for assessing seismic displacements of soil-retaining walls. Part I: Geosynthetic-reinforced modular block walls
Geosynthetics International (December,2006)
Cyclic and post-cyclic behaviour from sand–geogrid interface large-scale direct shear tests
Geosynthetics International (October,2015)
Finite element parametric study of the behavior of segmental block reinforced-soil retaining walls
Geosynthetics International (June,2003)
Shaking table study of the influence of facing on reinforced soil wall connection loads
Geosynthetics International (February,2020)
Related Chapters
Unpaved roads
Handbook of Geosynthetic Engineering: Geosynthetics and their applications
INFLUENCE OF SILICA FUME ON THE AGGREGATE / MORTAR INTERFACIAL BOND STRENGTH
Innovations and Developments In Concrete Materials And Construction: Proceedings of the International Conference held at the University of Dundee, Scotland, UK on 9–11 September 2002
Web-Based Travel Survey: A Demo
Transport Survey Methods: Best Practice for Decision Making
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
