Analytical and numerical solutions for the problem of geosynthetic-reinforced fills over a void have been the subject of investigation for the last four decades. A common feature of this prior work is that all methods have treated the analytical solutions as deterministic. While the treatment of some input parameters must be taken as deterministic, there are other parameters that have uncertainty. Furthermore, the underlying mechanistic models for load and resistance terms in the limit state equations for the reinforced fill over a void problem can be expected to have different accuracy. This paper revisits the problem of geosynthetic-reinforced fills over voids from a probabilistic point of view for reinforcement tensile strain, tensile strength, and geosynthetic stiffness limit states. Particular attention is paid to the method used to select the isochronous stiffness of the reinforcement and the associated uncertainty in the magnitude of that value. The paper demonstrates how the factor of safety from deterministic past practice can be linked quantitatively to the reliability index used in contemporary probabilistic design. Finally, the paper demonstrates the advantage of using product-specific constant-load creep test results to maximise margins of safety for strength and stiffness limit states in both deterministic and probabilistic frameworks.
Article navigation
December 2024
Research Article|
December 05 2024
Probabilistic analysis for the reinforced fill over void problem
R. J. Bathurst;
R. J. Bathurst
1 Professor and Research Director, Department of Civil Engineering, GeoEngineering Centre at Queen's-RMC, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, ON, Canada, E-mail: bathurst-r@rmc.ca (corresponding author)
Search for other works by this author on:
F. M. Naftchali
F. M. Naftchali
2 PhD student, Department of Civil Engineering, GeoEngineering Centre at Queen's-RMC, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada, E-mail: 18fmn@queensu.ca
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
April 17 2023
Accepted:
July 31 2023
Online ISSN: 1751-7613
Print ISSN: 1072-6349
© 2024 Emerald Publishing Limited
2024
Geosynthetics International (2024) 31 (6): 835–861.
Article history
Received:
April 17 2023
Accepted:
July 31 2023
Citation
Bathurst RJ, Naftchali FM (2024), "Probabilistic analysis for the reinforced fill over void problem". Geosynthetics International, Vol. 31 No. 6 pp. 835–861, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.23.00067
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Influence of geosynthetic stiffness on analytical solutions for reinforced fill over void
Geosynthetics International (April,2022)
Deterministic and probabilistic failure analysis of simple geosynthetic reinforced soil slopes
Geosynthetics International (July,2016)
Long-term response and design of two geosynthetics: effect of field installation damage
Geosynthetics International (February,2018)
Influence of creep on the small-strain stiffness of sand–rubber mixtures
Geotechnique (March,2021)
A probabilistic study on the geometrical design of gravity retaining walls
World Journal of Engineering (October,2017)
Related Chapters
THE STRUCTURAL EUROCODES: A NEW ERA FOR CONCRETE
Application of Codes, Design and Regulations: Proceedings of the International Conference held at the University of Dundee, Scotland, UK on 5–7 July 2005
Target reliability for design and evaluation of bridges
Bridge Management 5: Inspection, maintenance, assessment and repair: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Bridge Management, organized by the University of Surrey, 11–13 April 2005
Soil behaviour
The Essence of Geotechnical Engineering: 60 years of Géotechnique
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
