Many different formulations for converting a prefabricated vertical drain with a rectangular cross section to an equivalent diameter well have been developed. In addition to equivalent diameter, engineers must also consider the impact of smear when designing a system that utilizes prefabricated vertical drains. An experiment and mathematical modeling were used to study the validity of using a reduced equivalent diameter to account for smear. Mathematical modeling of the four most commonly used equivalent diameter formulations yielded nearly the same equipotentials. In addition, the equipotentials calculated for the equivalent diameter wells differed substantially from a prefabricated vertical drain modeled with and without smear. This indicates that equipotentials are not the best means to evaluate equivalent diameter formulations because the change in shape from a rectangle to a circle impacts the head values to such a degree that the equipotentials will never be similar, regardless of whether smear is included.
Article navigation
Technical Paper|
January 01 2000
Using a Reduced Equivalent Diameter for a Prefabricated Vertical Drain to Account for Smear
A.L. Welker;
A.L. Welker
Assistant Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Villanova University, 800 Lancaster Avenue, Villanova, Pennsylvania 19087, USA, Telephone: 1/610-519-4959, Telefax: 1/610-519-6754, E-mail: andrea.welker@villanova.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
R.B. Gilbert;
R.B. Gilbert
Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, ECJ 9.227, Austin, Texas 78712, USA, Telephone: 1/512-232-3688, Telefax: 1/512-571-6548, E-mail: bob_gilbert@mail.utexas.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
J.J. Bowders
J.J. Bowders
Associate Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, E2509 Engineering Building East, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri 65211-2200, USA, Telephone: 1/573-882-8351, Telefax: 1/573-882-4784, E-mail: bowders@missouri.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
October 20 1999
Revision Received:
January 12 2000
Accepted:
March 01 2000
Online ISSN: 1751-7613
Print ISSN: 1072-6349
Industrial Fabrics Association International, 1801 County Road B West, Roseville, Minnesota 55113-4061, USA, Telephone: 1/612-222-2508, Telefax: 1/612-631-9334
2000
Geosynthetics International (2000) 7 (1): 47–57.
Article history
Received:
October 20 1999
Revision Received:
January 12 2000
Accepted:
March 01 2000
Citation
Welker A, Gilbert R, Bowders J (2000), "Using a Reduced Equivalent Diameter for a Prefabricated Vertical Drain to Account for Smear". Geosynthetics International, Vol. 7 No. 1 pp. 47–57, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.7.0165
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Design of prefabricated vertical drains considering soil disturbance
Geosynthetics International (June,2009)
Three-dimensional numerical modelling of soft ground improved by prefabricated vertical drains
Geosynthetics International (October,2009)
Vacuum consolidation of dredged slurry improved by horizontal drainage-enhanced geotextile
Geosynthetics International (December,2024)
Consolidation analysis of soft soil improved with short deep mixed columns and long prefabricated vertical drains (PVDs)
Geosynthetics International (August,2015)
Assessing the performance of prefabricated vertical drain with vacuum and heat preloading
Geosynthetics International (October,2009)
Related Chapters
Paved roads
Handbook of Geosynthetic Engineering: Geosynthetics and their applications
Slopes – stabilisation
Handbook of Geosynthetic Engineering: Geosynthetics and their applications
Fundamentals of geosynthetics
ICE Handbook of Geosynthetic Engineering: Geosynthetics and their applications
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
