Cable burial risk assessment (CBRA) defines minimum seabed burial depth of cables to avoid interaction with towed objects that penetrate the seabed, for example, drag embedment anchors (DEA). Recent physical modelling studies have shown that model anchors dragged in dry sand may penetrate to much greater depths in loose sand than current CBRA approaches predict. As other seabed penetrating objects (e.g. pipeline ploughs) have shown velocity or rate of pull dependent behaviour in saturated soils, it is necessary to check for similar rate-dependent penetration behaviour for DEAs. This is required to verify the effect of anchor drag rates in CBRA methods and the validity of previous modelling studies that differ in their findings from current CBRA. This study used model centrifuge tests of DEAs pulled at varying rates in saturated conditions. The result show that anchor penetration depths are reduced with increasing drag rates. The results also confirm that CBRA assumptions of anchor orientation are not consistent with observed behaviour and soil penetration factors require updating. The results suggest that CBRA approaches should also consider the drag speed of the penetration event as this may vary during emergency deployment or may be much lower where a vessel drifts at anchor.
Article navigation
20 March 2026
Research Article|
December 16 2025
Effect of drag rates on drag embedment anchor penetration for cable burial risk assessment Available to Purchase
M. J. Brown
;
*School of Science and Engineering,
University of Dundee
, Dundee, UK
Corresponding author M. J. Brown (m.j.z.brown@dundee.ac.uk)
Search for other works by this author on:
R. E. Bird
;
R. E. Bird
‡Department of Engineering,
Durham University
, Durham, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
W. M. Coombs
;
W. M. Coombs
§Department of Engineering,
Durham University
, Durham, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
C. E. Augarde
;
C. E. Augarde
‖Department of Engineering,
Durham University
, Durham, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
C. Macdonald
;
C. Macdonald
#
British Geological Survey
, Edinburgh, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
D. Stevens
D. Stevens
*
British Geological Survey
, Edinburgh, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Corresponding author M. J. Brown (m.j.z.brown@dundee.ac.uk)
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
July 15 2025
Accepted:
November 26 2025
Funding
Funding Group:
- Award Group:
- Funder(s): UKRI EPSRC
- Award Id(s): EP/W000954,W000997,W000970
- Funder(s):
- Funding Statement(s): This work was funded through the UKRI EPSRC grant EP/W000954, W000997, W000970 “Offshore Cable Burial: How deep is deep enough?”, and undertaken in collaboration with Durham University and the British Geological Survey (BGS).
© 2025 Emerald Publishing Limited
2025
Emerald Publishing Limited
Licensed re-use rights only
Geotechnique Letters (2026) 16 (1): 77–81.
Article history
Received:
July 15 2025
Accepted:
November 26 2025
Citation
Brown MJ, Sharif YU, Bird RE, Coombs WM, Augarde CE, Macdonald C, Stevens D (2026), "Effect of drag rates on drag embedment anchor penetration for cable burial risk assessment". Geotechnique Letters, Vol. 16 No. 1 pp. 77–81, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.25.00069
Download citation file:
133
Views
Suggested Reading
Diameter and pile-sand stiffness effects on laterally loaded piles in centrifuge modelling
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics (October,2025)
Comparison of 1g and centrifuge modelling of drag anchors with subsurface wireless tracking
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics (February,2025)
Centrifuge modelling of suction anchors under multidirectional loading for shared mooring applications
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics (January,2026)
Contribution of transhemispheric swells to the wave energy potential in the Canary Islands
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Energy (June,2025)
A techno-economic assessment of decommissioning an offshore wind farm in The Netherlands
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Civil Engineering (October,2025)
Related Chapters
Seismic structure–soil–structure interaction between pairs of adjacent building structures
Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering: Géotechnique Symposium in Print 2015
Dynamic response of liquefiable sand improved by microbial-induced calcite precipitation
Bio- and Chemo-Mechanical Processes in Geotechnical Engineering: Géotechnique Symposium in Print 2013
Physical modelling
The Essence of Geotechnical Engineering: 60 years of Géotechnique
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
