During construction of the running tunnels for the Jubilee Line Extension, London, large variations in tunnelling volume loss were measured over about a 2 km distance between Waterloo, south of the Thames, and the area north of St James's Park. At the design stage, a value of volume loss of 2% was adopted, which was thought to be conservative. In practice, volume losses of greater than 3% were measured in Westminster and in St James's Park, south of the lake. North of the St James's Park lake volume losses were less than 2%, as expected. Reliable estimates of volume loss are required for the planning and approval of future tunnelling projects in London, and so a detailed investigation was undertaken to establish the reasons for the observed differences. Two primary and interlinked causes for the large volume losses are identified. First, the method of tunnelling and construction control: south of the lake up to 1·9 m of unsupported tunnel heading was often advanced ahead of the shield, and as a result about 50% of the measured volume loss occurred in front of the shield. Second, the geological conditions: the crown of the westbound tunnel lies just below, and the invert of the eastbound tunnel just above, a division of the London Clay that contains numerous sand and silt partings. There was therefore a considerable potential for loosening and softening, particularly with excavation significantly ahead of the shield. Also, there is less clay cover and lower strengths to the south of the lake owing to past erosion (the study area straddles two of the Thames terraces). This case study highlights the importance of taking the engineering geology into account, even in a city such as London where there are decades of experience of tunnelling and the ground conditions are well characterised. The message is equally applicable to many other cities where large subsurface infrastructure projects are planned.
Article navigation
February 2006
Research Article|
February 01 2006
Unexpected tunnelling volume losses in the Westminster area, London
J. R. Standing;
J. R. Standing
*
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London
UK
Search for other works by this author on:
J. B. Burland
J. B. Burland
*
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London
UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
December 01 2003
Accepted:
November 01 2005
Online ISSN: 1751-7656
Print ISSN: 0016-8505
© 2006 Thomas Telford Ltd
2006
Geotechnique (2006) 56 (1): 11–26.
Article history
Received:
December 01 2003
Accepted:
November 01 2005
Citation
Standing JR, Burland JB (2006), "Unexpected tunnelling volume losses in the Westminster area, London". Geotechnique, Vol. 56 No. 1 pp. 11–26, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2006.56.1.11
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Greenfield ground response to EPBM tunnelling in London Clay
Geotechnique (April,2013)
3D numerical modelling of soil–structure interaction during EPB tunnelling
Geotechnique (January,2015)
Modelling of long-term ground response to tunnelling under St James's Park, London
Geotechnique (February,2007)
Thames Tunnel: geology, site investigation and geotechnical problems
Geotechnique (June,1994)
Auscultation et modélisation numérique du processus de creusement à l'aide d'un tunnelier
Geotechnique (December,1998)
Related Chapters
Modelling of long-term ground response to tunnelling under St James's Park, London
Stiff Sedimentary Clays: Genesis and Engineering Behaviour: Géotechnique Symposium in Print 2007
Measured short-term subsurface ground displacements from EPBM tunnelling in London Clay
Tunnelling in the Urban Environment: Géotechnique Symposium in Print 2017
Geostatistical method for analysing soil displacement from underground urban construction
Risk and Variability in Geotechnical Engineering
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
