Textbooks and university courses teach elasticity and plasticity as separate methods for analysing the stiffness and strength of a shallow foundation. The behaviour of real soil is neither linear elastic nor perfectly plastic. In this paper, two simple techniques for incorporating non-linearity in routine design have been validated using finite element (FE) analysis. These two techniques—Atkinson's method and the mobilisable strength design (MSD) approach—assume that the responses of an individual soil element and the boundary value problem being considered are self-similar. Using this assumption, the soil element response can be scaled to predict the response of the boundary value problem. Atkinson's method is based on elasticity whereas MSD uses plasticity. Non-linearity has been captured in the FE analysis using a power law soil model. This approach uses minimal parameters, but is shown to capture accurately the undrained stress–strain response of typical clays under monotonic loading. Comparison with elastic and plastic solutions showed that the FE analysis was accurate to within < 5% at the elastic and plastic extremes of the loading range. The responses of the soil and the boundary value problem are shown to be sufficiently self-similar up to two-thirds of the failure load for the foundation response to be predicted simply by a linear scaling of the soil response. Previously reported scaling factors for vertical loading are confirmed, and new factors for horizontal and moment loading are derived. These results show that, for this particular boundary value problem, soil non-linearity can be captured with sufficient accuracy for routine design, without recourse to sophisticated numerical analysis. These self-similarity methods are simple enough to be taught to undergraduates, and could be incorporated in textbooks alongside the core sections on elasticity and plasticity, providing guidance on the application of these techniques to real non-linear soil.
Article navigation
November 2007
Research Article|
November 01 2007
Simple prediction of the undrained displacement of a circular surface foundation on non-linear soil
A. S. Osman;
A. S. Osman
*
School of Engineering, Durham University
UK
Search for other works by this author on:
D. J. White;
D. J. White
†
Schofield Centre, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge
UK
Search for other works by this author on:
A. M. Britto;
A. M. Britto
‡
IT Services Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge
UK
Search for other works by this author on:
M. D. Bolton
M. D. Bolton
†
Schofield Centre, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge
UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
July 05 2006
Accepted:
June 27 2007
Online ISSN: 1751-7656
Print ISSN: 0016-8505
© 2007 Thomas Telford Ltd
2007
Geotechnique (2007) 57 (9): 729–737.
Article history
Received:
July 05 2006
Accepted:
June 27 2007
Citation
Osman AS, White DJ, Britto AM, Bolton MD (2007), "Simple prediction of the undrained displacement of a circular surface foundation on non-linear soil". Geotechnique, Vol. 57 No. 9 pp. 729–737, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2007.57.9.729
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Simple plasticity-based prediction of the undrained settlement of shallow circular foundations on clay
Geotechnique (August,2005)
Tunnel–framed building interaction: comparison between raft and separate footing foundations
Geotechnique (August,2020)
Centrifuge modelling of spudcan–pile interaction in soft clay
Geotechnique (September,2012)
On dimensioning the base of a traditional retaining wall
Geotechnique Letters (May,2012)
Centrifuge modelling of spudcan–pile interaction in soft clay overlying sand
Geotechnique (September,2016)
Related Chapters
Probabilistic limiting tolerable displacements for serviceability limit state design of foundations
Risk and Variability in Geotechnical Engineering
Partial factors calibration based on reliability analyses for square footings on granular soils
Risk and Variability in Geotechnical Engineering
Importance of seismic site response and soil–structure interaction in the dynamic behaviour of a tall building founded on piles
Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering: Géotechnique Symposium in Print 2015
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
