Challenges associated with dynamically installed anchors include prediction of the anchor embedment depth, which dictates the anchor's holding capacity. This is particularly true for calcareous sediments, as very little performance data exist for this anchor type in these soils. This paper reports results from a series of model tests undertaken to provide insight into the behaviour of a torpedo anchor during dynamic installation and monotonic pullout in lightly overconsolidated calcareous silt. The tests were carried out in a beam centrifuge, varying the drop height and consequently the impact velocity, and the consolidation period prior to anchor pullout. The mudline load inclination was also varied to encompass various mooring configurations. The centrifuge model test data were used to calibrate: (a) an analytical dynamic embedment model, based on conventional bearing and frictional resistance factors but with strain-rate-dependent undrained shear strength for the soil; and (b) an analytical quasi-static vertical pullout capacity model, accounting for reverse end bearing and frictional resistance. A total energy based expression, appropriate for calcareous silts, was proposed for predicting anchor embedment depth for a given anchor geometry, mass and impact velocity. For assessing anchor vertical holding capacity, a piezocone based direct design approach was also proposed, deriving anchor end bearing and frictional resistance from cone tip resistance and sleeve friction, respectively. Anchor capacity under inclined loading was presented as failure envelopes expressed in terms of dimensionless vertical and horizontal components of anchor net resistance, which agreed well with a finite-element based envelope developed for embedded foundations. The regain of anchor capacity was found to be in good agreement with predictions based on the cavity expansion framework.
Article navigation
February 2015
Research Article|
February 01 2015
Dynamic installation and monotonic pullout of a torpedo anchor in calcareous silt Available to Purchase
M.S. HOSSAIN;
M.S. HOSSAIN
*
* Centre for Offshore Foundation Systems (COFS), The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia.
Search for other works by this author on:
C.D. O'LOUGHLIN;
C.D. O'LOUGHLIN
*
* Centre for Offshore Foundation Systems (COFS), The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia.
Search for other works by this author on:
* Centre for Offshore Foundation Systems (COFS), The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia.
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
September 04 2013
Accepted:
December 12 2014
Online ISSN: 1751-7656
Print ISSN: 0016-8505
© 2015 Thomas Telford Ltd
2015
Geotechnique (2015) 65 (2): 77–90.
Article history
Received:
September 04 2013
Accepted:
December 12 2014
Citation
HOSSAIN M, O'LOUGHLIN C, KIM Y (2015), "Dynamic installation and monotonic pullout of a torpedo anchor in calcareous silt". Geotechnique, Vol. 65 No. 2 pp. 77–90, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.13.P.153
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Experimental observations of the penetration of spudcan footings in silt
Geotechnique (August,2012)
Penetration of dynamically installed anchors in clay
Geotechnique (September,2013)
Drained cyclic capacity of plate anchors in dense sand: Experimental and theoretical observations
Geotechnique Letters (July,2015)
Soil response in the wake of dynamically installed projectiles
Geotechnique Letters (August,2015)
Long-term axial capacity of deepwater jetted piles
Geotechnique (December,2014)
Related Chapters
Physical modelling
The Essence of Geotechnical Engineering: 60 years of Géotechnique
Engineering testing and monitoring
Temporary Works Part Two: Further Principles of Design and Construction
STRESS-STRAIN RESPONSE AND FAILURE SURFACE OF HIGH STRENGTH CONCRETE UNDER GENERALIZED STATE OF STRESS
Innovations and Developments In Concrete Materials And Construction: Proceedings of the International Conference held at the University of Dundee, Scotland, UK on 9–11 September 2002
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
