Comparison of finite-element limit analysis and strength reduction techniques

In practical geotechnical engineering the factor of safety is still determined by means of simple limit equilibrium analysis in many cases. However, because displacement finite-element analysis is routinely applied for assessing displacements and stresses for working load conditions, this technique is increasingly being used to calculate ultimate limit states and, consequently, factors of safety, usually by means of the so-called strength reduction technique, and results which are comparable to those obtained with limit equilibrium methods have been reported in the literature. However, owing to the inherent assumptions of limit equilibrium analyses, they do not always provide unique factors of safety. The purpose of this paper is on the one hand to compare the strength reduction method with rigorous limit analyses which are based on collapse theorems of plasticity, and on the other hand to investigate if a shortcoming of the strength reduction method, namely possible numerical instabilities for non-associated plasticity, can be overcome. Two examples are considered, namely slope stability and tunnel face stability. Finally an important note on the definition of the factor of safety for effective and total stress analysis under undrained conditions is provided.