Root architecture and reinforcement are important parameters to measure the safety of vegetated slopes and stream banks against slope instability and erosion or to assess the stability of plants against environmental loading (e.g. windthrow of trees). However, these are difficult to measure without time-consuming sampling or counting procedures. Previous studies proposed using a penetrometer with an adapted geometry, and showed that individual root breakages could be detected as sudden drops in penetrometer resistance. However, there are no existing models to derive root properties from the measured traces. Here, several interpretative models are developed and their performance at identifying and characterising buried acrylonitrile butadiene styrene root analogues of varying diameter and architecture in sand are assessed. It was found that models, assuming the analogues broke in bending rather than tension, provided good predictions for the force–displacement behaviour. The simple analytical bending model developed here was shown to perform almost as well as more sophisticated numerical models. For all models, the predictions of additional penetrometer force required to break the root analogue were more accurate than predictions for lateral root displacement required to reach failure. The root analogue diameter and to a lesser extent the soil resistance and root angle were shown to affect the penetrometer resistance strongly. Root branching, root length and the distance between the point of load application and a root boundary (root tip or parent root) had a much smaller effect. When the root failure mechanism, root strength, root stiffness and soil resistance are known, an accurate prediction of the root diameter can be made based on the root peak resistance value identified from a blade penetration test. Penetrometer testing, a test which is easy to perform in the field, coupled with an accurate interpretative model might therefore be an effective method to rapidly quantify the spatial distribution, depths and diameters of roots.
Article navigation
April 2018
Research Article|
July 26 2017
In situ root identification through blade penetrometer testing – part 1: interpretative models and laboratory testing Available to Purchase
G. J. Meijer
;
G. J. Meijer
*Division of Civil Engineering, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK; James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, UK; and Forest Research, Northern Research Station, Roslin, UK.
Search for other works by this author on:
G. Bengough
;
G. Bengough
†Division of Civil Engineering, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK; James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee,UK.
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Knappett
;
J. Knappett
‡Division of Civil Engineering, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Search for other works by this author on:
K. Loades
;
K. Loades
§James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, UK.
Search for other works by this author on:
B. Nicoll
;
B. Nicoll
∥Forest Research, Northern Research Station, Roslin, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
I. Mukov;
I. Mukov
¶Division of Civil Engineering, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Search for other works by this author on:
M. Zhang
M. Zhang
¶Division of Civil Engineering, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
August 13 2016
Accepted:
June 15 2017
Online ISSN: 1751-7656
Print ISSN: 0016-8505
© 2017 Thomas Telford Ltd
2017
Geotechnique (2018) 68 (4): 303–319.
Article history
Received:
August 13 2016
Accepted:
June 15 2017
Citation
Meijer GJ, Bengough G, Knappett J, Loades K, Nicoll B, Mukov I, Zhang M (2018), "In situ root identification through blade penetrometer testing – part 1: interpretative models and laboratory testing". Geotechnique, Vol. 68 No. 4 pp. 303–319, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.P.203
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
In situ root identification through blade penetrometer testing – part 2: field testing
Geotechnique (August,2017)
Comparing CPTU Q–F and Q–Δu2/σv0′soil classification charts
Geotechnique Letters (December,2012)
Interpreting and validating the thermal cone penetration test (T-CPT)
Geotechnique (September,2018)
Estimation of soil strength in fine-grained soils by instrumented free-fall sphere tests
Geotechnique (June,2016)
New in situ techniques for measuring the properties of root-reinforced soil – laboratory evaluation
Geotechnique (November,2015)
Related Chapters
Laboratory and field testing
The Essence of Geotechnical Engineering: 60 years of Géotechnique
Random field characterisation of stress-normalised cone penetration testing parameters
Risk and Variability in Geotechnical Engineering
Nature's Contribution to Health and Well-being in Cities
Nature-Based Solutions for More Sustainable Cities – A Framework Approach for Planning and Evaluation
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
