In various analytical, semi-analytical and numerical studies on laterally loaded piles, the pile is conventionally modelled as an Euler–Bernoulli beam. Modelling large-diameter monopiles and piles using the Euler–Bernoulli beam theory may not be appropriate, because the Euler–Bernoulli beam theory is strictly valid for long, slender piles and does not account for shear deformations, which may have a significant effect on the lateral pile response of large-diameter piles. In order to investigate the effect of shear deformation in the modelling of monopiles and piles, a framework for static analysis of laterally loaded piles is developed, in which the monopile/pile is modelled using the Timoshenko beam theory and the soil as an elastic continuum. A rational soil displacement field is assumed and the differential equations of pile and soil displacements are obtained using calculus of variations. Solutions are obtained analytically and numerically following an iterative scheme. The analysis framework also incorporates the Euler–Bernoulli and rigid beam theories as progressive simplifications of the Timoshenko beam theory. Pile responses obtained using the three beam theories are compared with three-dimensional finite-element analysis to establish the relative accuracies of each beam theory in predicting lateral pile response. Systematic parametric studies are performed to establish which beam theory is most appropriate to model laterally loaded monopiles and piles, particularly the large-diameter piles, and to find out the range of applicability of the different beam theories in predicting lateral pile response. The Timoshenko beam theory can be used for all cases of laterally loaded piles to produce the most accurate results, particularly for piles with hollow cross-sections. The Euler–Bernoulli beam theory produces accurate results for most piles with solid cross-sections. The rigid beam theory can be used for a quick initial estimate of pile head displacement, particularly for piles with high values of relative pile–soil stiffness ratio.
Article navigation
September 2018
Research Article|
January 03 2018
Applicability of Timoshenko, Euler–Bernoulli and rigid beam theories in analysis of laterally loaded monopiles and piles Available to Purchase
B. K. Gupta;
B. K. Gupta
*Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Search for other works by this author on:
D. Basu
D. Basu
*Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
September 29 2016
Accepted:
November 10 2017
Online ISSN: 1751-7656
Print ISSN: 0016-8505
© 2017 Thomas Telford Ltd
2017
Geotechnique (2018) 68 (9): 772–785.
Article history
Received:
September 29 2016
Accepted:
November 10 2017
Citation
Gupta BK, Basu D (2018), "Applicability of Timoshenko, Euler–Bernoulli and rigid beam theories in analysis of laterally loaded monopiles and piles". Geotechnique, Vol. 68 No. 9 pp. 772–785, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.P.244
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Simple approach for including foundation–soil–foundation interaction in the static stiffnesses of multi-element shallow foundations
Geotechnique (June,2020)
A Winkler model for suction caisson foundations in homogeneous and non-homogeneous linear elastic soil
Geotechnique (December,2020)
Elastic response of circular footings embedded in a non-homogeneous half-space
Geotechnique (October,2003)
Elastic stiffness of circular footings on clay overlying sand under general loading
Geotechnique Letters (October,2020)
Second-order stiffness matrix and loading vector of a pile element on non-homogeneous soil
Geotechnique Letters (February,2021)
Related Chapters
Elasticities of Stock Prices in Emerging Markets
The Impact of the Global Financial Crisis on Emerging Financial Markets
Valuation, Accounting and Climate Risk
Climate Risks Reporting Practices and Assurance
A Stated Adaptation Approach to Surveying Activity Scheduling Decisions
Transport Survey Methods: Best Practice for Decision Making
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
