Glacial tills are a product of the glacial processes of erosion, transportation and deposition and could have been subjected to several glacial cycles and periglacial processes to the extent that they are complex, hazardous soils that are spatially variable in composition, structure, fabric and properties, making them very difficult to sample, test and classify. An overview of the formation of glacial tills and their properties shows that they are composite soils which should be classified according to their lithology, their mode of deposition to link the glacial processes with the facies characteristics and their engineering behaviour. This enables representative design properties to be assigned using frameworks developed for composite soils.

A

activity

Cc

coefficient of curvature

Cc-g

global compression index

Cu

coefficient of uniformity

cu

undrained shear strength

d10

particle size of 10% of the particle size distribution

e, f

constants

eg

global void ratio

eg100

global void ratio at an effective stress of 100 kPa

ei

intergranular void ratio

eL

void ratio at the liquid limit

em

matrix void ratio

IL

liquid limit

kh

coefficient of hydraulic conductivity

mv

coefficient of volume compressibility

pa

atmospheric pressure

ϒd

dry density

σv′

effective vertical stress

φ′

angle of friction

Glacial tills, which are extensive throughout the temperate zone, are complex, hazardous soils that are spatially variable in composition, structure, fabric and properties, making them very difficult to sample, test and classify (Clarke, 2017; Griffiths and Martins, 2017). They are a product of the glacial processes of erosion, transportation and deposition and could have been subjected to several glacial cycles and periglacial processes to the extent that interpretation of investigations can be challenging.

There are four categories used in the classification of soils for engineering purposes: very coarse-grained, coarse-grained, fine-grained and organic soils. Glacial soils can be composed of one or more of these categories such that their engineering behaviour is not consistent with the engineering classification (Clarke, 2017). All glacial tills are subject to gravitational forces during deposition, and many are also subject to shear. Thus, it is possible to have tills with the same composition but distinctly different properties. Hence, tills should be categorised according to a lithological classification (e.g. BS EN ISO 14688-1:2002+A1:2013 (BSI, 2002)) as well as a genetic classification (e.g. Giles et al., 2017), to link the glacial processes with the facies characteristics, and according to a classification scheme based on their engineering behaviour (e.g. Clarke, 2017). This paper explains the reasons for this by providing an overview of the formation of subglacial tills and the impact that it has on their characteristics, and techniques that could be used to generate design properties. The spatial variability of tills means that it is difficult to assign representative characteristic design values. Using knowledge of the formation of tills and composite soil behaviour, a ground investigation strategy is introduced to improve the quality of the results.

Over the years, glacial geologists have developed classification schemes for till based on the modes of transport (i.e. subglacial, glacial or supraglacial) and deposition (e.g. deformation, lodgement, melt-out and comminution) (e.g. Benn and Evans, 2010). The current view is that glacial tills are a result of (a) deformation (glaciotectonite), (b) a combination of deposition and deformation (subglacial traction till) or (c) deposition alone (melt-out till). Glaciotectonite and subtraction tills are generally much denser than melt-out tills since those deposits are subject to shear as well as gravitational forces during deposition. Glacial tills may be the result of several periods of glacial and periglacial activities creating complex structures that are difficult to construct from borehole information.

Glaciers sliding over the substrate, formed of solid and superficial geology, initially deform the substrate to create glaciotectonite which retains some of the original structure of the parent substrate (e.g. Banham, 1977; Benn and Evans, 2010; Pedersen, 1988). Tectonic features are developed including brittle shear planes, faults and ductile folds. Extensive shear strain can produce laminations, with distinctly different soils between the laminations. Pods of stiffer material are generated because of the variation in stiffness in the substrate and because of the local temperature and pore pressure regimes. Glacial movement, with time, will start to erode the substrate by either abrasion (Hallet, 1979) or quarrying (Iverson, 2012), the amount depending on the glacier velocity, the temperature and pressure at the base of the glacier, the interface friction between the ice and the bed, a function of the bed roughness and the strength of the underlying sediment. Further deformation leads to increasing disaggregation of the sediment and abrasion, thus breaking down the sediment until it is eventually completely homogenised (Elson, 1961). Progressive crushing and abrasion result in a fractal particle size distribution with a dimension of 2·65 (Iverson et al., 1996). The eroded material forms glacial debris, which can be transported considerable distances by ice before it is deposited as subglacial traction till or melt-out till depending on whether the ice is advancing or retreating.

A vertical profile (Figure 1) through the substrate may show a sequence ranging from undisturbed sediment at depth to completely homogenised till at the top with no distinct boundaries between the layers. If the substrate is a glacial soil, then the deformed substrate can contain remnants of previous glaciations, the treacherous pockets of water-bearing sands and gravels and softer clays highlighted by Ansted (1888), for example.

Figure 1

Features of subglacial tills highlighting the challenge of creating a three-dimensional image of glacial tills because of structural features associated with deformation and the difficulty of identifying bedrock due to rafted rock and boulder beds, lens and layers of weaker clays/water-bearing sands and gravels and dropstones (after Clarke (2017))

Figure 1

Features of subglacial tills highlighting the challenge of creating a three-dimensional image of glacial tills because of structural features associated with deformation and the difficulty of identifying bedrock due to rafted rock and boulder beds, lens and layers of weaker clays/water-bearing sands and gravels and dropstones (after Clarke (2017))

Close Figure 1

Subglacial traction till results from the lodgement of glacial debris beneath a glacier by pressure melting or other mechanical processes (e.g. Dreimanis, 1989) against an obstruction or when the frictional resistance between a clast and the underlying substrate exceeds the frictional drag of the glacier. Subglacial traction tills are usually very dense with a low water content because of the combination of the pressures of the ice and shear. They are sometimes described as overconsolidated because they are dense rather than being as result of the geotechnical process of consolidation. They are often fissile with potential slip planes, suggesting shear during deposition. These tills have bimodal or multimodal particle size distributions with distinct rock flour and gravel ranges. Cobbles and boulders are aligned with the direction of the ice flow.

Melt-out till is formed of englacial and supraglacial debris deposited from stagnant or slow-moving ice without further transport or deformation (Benn and Evans, 2010). The clast content reflects high-level transport in which particles retain their angularity. Melt-out till is generally poorly consolidated because it has not been subjected to high pressures or shear. Therefore, it has a relatively low density compared to other tills. More importantly, this till has been subjected to gravitational consolidation, whereas the other tills are subject to shear as well as gravitational loads.

The properties of glacial tills (Figure 2) are spatially variable, both vertically and horizontally, making it difficult to obtain representative samples and select appropriate design parameters. This can be attributed, in part, to the form of deformation, subglacial drainage and pore pressure (Table 1) as they control the rheology and strength of glacier beds and the glacial motion. It is now accepted that till undergoes deformation (at low effective pressures) and lodgement and ploughing (at high effective pressures) (e.g. Brown et al., 1987; Evans et al., 2006; Hart, 1995; Hart and Boulton, 1991; van de Meer et al., 2003). The effective pressure can vary laterally, creating areas of low and high effective stress that change with time (e.g. Alley, 1993; MacAyeal et al., 1995; Piotrowski et al., 2004; Stokes et al., 2007). Distinct till fabric is created (e.g. Andrews, 1971; Benn, 1995; Carr and Rose, 2003; Dowdeswell and Sharp, 1986; Hart, 1994). The local strength of tills depends on the constraints to the deforming layer; a constrained layer has a high strength (Benn, 1995; Hart, 2006), and a thicker, less-constrained layer will have a low strength (Dowdeswell and Sharp, 1986; Hart et al., 2004; Hicock et al., 1996).

Figure 2

An example of a comparison of the variation in undrained shear strength (estimated from standard penetration tests (SPTN) and overconsolidation ratio (OCR)) with depth highlighting the difficulty of selecting a design profile because of the effects of composition and fabric on matrix-dominated till. This example is from north-eastern England (after Clarke (2017)); examples from other parts of the UK can be found in the paper by Culshaw et al. (2017) 

Figure 2

An example of a comparison of the variation in undrained shear strength (estimated from standard penetration tests (SPTN) and overconsolidation ratio (OCR)) with depth highlighting the difficulty of selecting a design profile because of the effects of composition and fabric on matrix-dominated till. This example is from north-eastern England (after Clarke (2017)); examples from other parts of the UK can be found in the paper by Culshaw et al. (2017) 

Close Figure 2
Table 1

Possible pore pressure generation and groundwater flow within the substrate

Groundwater movementBulk movement of pore water and soil particles within the deforming substrate (Clarke, 1997)
Movement of pore fluid (Boulton and Jones, 1979; Boulton et al., 1994; Murray and Dowdeswell, 1992)
Pipe flow (Boulton et al., 1994; Smart, 1986)
Dendritic channel networks at the ice–substrate interface either in the ice, in the substrate or within tunnel valleys (Boulton and Hindmarsh, 1987; Nye, 1973; Rothlisberger, 1972; Shreve, 1972)
Linked cavity systems (Hallet and Anderson, 1980; Kamb, 1987; Sharp et al., 1989; Walder and Hallet, 1979)
Braided canal networks formed of wide, shallow channels between the ice and deformable substrate (Clark and Walder, 1994; Walder and Fowler, 1994)
Thin films of water at the ice–substrate interface (Hallet, 1979; Weertman, 1972)
Pore pressure generationLow pore-water pressure – the glacier is coupled to the till (Boulton and Hindmarsh, 1987), mobilising the strength of the very dense till, which resists deformation. The glacier does move with some brittle shear taking place in the till (Benn and Evans, 1996; Boulton and Hindmarsh, 1987)
Medium pore-water pressure – reduction in substrate strength to an extent that ductile deformation takes place (Alley, 1989)
High pore-water pressure – decoupling of the glacier from the substrate, causing the glacier to slide over the substrate (Boulton et al., 2001; Fischer and Clarke, 1997; Iverson et al., 1996)

The basal motion of a glacier (Figure 3) can be due to sliding between ice and substrate, ploughing of clasts through the upper layer of the substrate and pervasive deformation of the bed or shearing across discrete planes in the bed, which depend on the degree of coupling at the ice–bed interface. Pervasive bed deformation is more likely to occur if high pore-water pressures cause the substrate yield strength to drop below a critical shear stress that can be supported by the ice–bed interface (Alley, 1989; Boulton and Hindmarsh, 1987). Complete decoupling of ice and sediment can occur if a layer of highly pressurised water develops at the interface increasing the tendency for the glacier to slide over the bed (Alley, 1989; Iken and Bindschadler, 1986). Incomplete coupling creates a transitional state between sliding and pervasive bed deformation known as ‘ploughing’, in which clasts that protrude across the ice–bed interface are dragged through the upper layer of the substrate. This ploughing process, assisted by local elevated pore pressures developed in front of clasts, leads to a local reduction in strength and therefore local deformation (Alley, 1989; Brown et al., 1987).

Figure 3

The effect of water content and clay content on the deformation of the substrate (after Alley (1989), Menzies (1989) and van de Meer et al. (2003)). An increase in water or clay content increases the depth of deformation and a possible switch from a brittle to a ductile behaviour

Figure 3

The effect of water content and clay content on the deformation of the substrate (after Alley (1989), Menzies (1989) and van de Meer et al. (2003)). An increase in water or clay content increases the depth of deformation and a possible switch from a brittle to a ductile behaviour

Close Figure 3

Deformation of subglacial traction tills causes preferred orientations of particles and micro- and macrofabric features, including weak fabrics parallel to the shearing direction (Clark, 1997; Dowdeswell and Sharp, 1986; Hart, 1994; Hicock, 1992); transverse fabrics (Carr and Rose, 2003; Glen et al., 1957); and variable fabric strength dependent on till porosity, water content or layer thickness (Dowdeswell et al., 1985; Evans et al., 2006; Hart, 1994); and with sufficient strain, it results in strong flow-parallel fabrics (Benn, 1995; Benn and Evans, 1996, 2010).

Glacial processes result in complex, spatially variable, dense, composite soils.

  • Composite soils – most glacial tills are either evenly graded or multigraded, containing a range of particle sizes from different categories of soils – that is, they are composite soils. Composite soils (Figure 4) are those soils that include more than one category of soil (BSI, 2002, 2009; Head, 1984; Omine et al., 1989). A till may be a fine-grained soil, a soil which is fully homogenised; a matrix-dominated soil, a soil which behaves as a fine-grained soil but contains coarse-grained particles; a clast-dominated soil, a soil which behaves as a coarse-grained soil but contains fine-grained particles; or a coarse-grained soil.

  • Spatially variable – the structure, fabric and properties are spatially variable because of the degree and type of deformation and the pore pressure and temperature regimes during deposition. The local conditions at the base of a glacier are complex such that the stress history of a glacial till layer can vary vertically and horizontally (Piotrowski et al., 2004). Two extremes can exist – an undrained condition in which the pore pressure increases with the thickness of ice, which means that there is no change in the effective vertical stress, and a drained condition (Figure 5) in which there is no change in pore pressure. The former leads to a normally consolidated till because unloading as the ice melts means that the pore pressure will reduce; thus, the effective vertical stress remains constant. The latter leads to a ‘heavily overconsolidated till’. It is likely that the actual conditions exist somewhere between these two extremes. Fully undrained conditions would result in very little change in deviator stress compared to the weight of ice. This process of gravitational consolidation is further complicated by shearing, resulting in particle breakage. The complex deposition process accounts for the scatter in strength index, density and water content with depth often associated with glacial tills.

  • Density – subglacial traction tills are often very dense, although these can contain pods, lenses and layers of less dense soils. The density is a result of the particle size distribution that can span across more than one category of soil and the combination of consolidation and shear during formation. These tills may be dense but not necessarily overconsolidated. The density depends on the pore pressure regime that existed during deposition. Thus, subglacial traction tills are likely to be dense no matter the degree of ‘overconsolidation’.

Figure 4

The compositions of composite soils (after Al-Moadhen et al. (2017))

Figure 4

The compositions of composite soils (after Al-Moadhen et al. (2017))

Close Figure 4
Figure 5

The effect of glaciation, deglaciation and isostatic uplift on the stress state within subglacial tills assuming fully drained conditions compared to the stress changes associated with sedimentation and erosion (after Clarke (2017)). GWL, groundwater level

Figure 5

The effect of glaciation, deglaciation and isostatic uplift on the stress state within subglacial tills assuming fully drained conditions compared to the stress changes associated with sedimentation and erosion (after Clarke (2017)). GWL, groundwater level

Close Figure 5

The composition, fabric and structure of tills, due to the erosional, depositional and postdepositional processes (Derbyshire et al., 1985), affect the mechanical properties of the soil (Table 2). Glacial tills can include rock flour, clay, silt, sand, gravel, cobbles and boulders depending on the source rock, the mode of deformation, the mode and distance of transportation and the mode of deposition. Discontinuities form in glacial tills (Boulton, 1996; Kirkaldie and Talbot, 1992) and can be horizontal (reduction in overburden and shearing) or vertical (isostatic unloading, freeze/thaw and shrinkage). Glacial tills also exhibit sedimentary structures, which are most easily observed in excavations and exposures. These complex structures are difficult to identify from boreholes, which means any projected cross-sections must be treated with caution.

Table 2

Geotechnical characteristics of glacial tills (after McGown and Derbyshire (1977))

TillClassFabricOCRRelative comparison of geotechnical propertiesa
DensityCompressibilityPermeabilityAnisotropy
DeformationGDeformed basal sediments or bedrock1535–8 
W
Mg
Mc
LodgementGInterlaying of glaciofluvial, joints, fissures, contortions; preferred clast orientation2–54–715–67
W5–822–3 
Mg6–824–5 
Mc6–832 
Melt-outGOccasional interlaying with glaciofluvial; clast oriented with englacial state1–22–42–47–93–5
W2–63–54–5 
Mg2–63–65–8 
Mc2–74–73–4 
a

1 is low; 9 is high

G, granular till; Mc, matrix till (cohesive); Mg, matrix till (granular); W, well-graded till

Glacial tills have the most diverse range of particle size distribution of any soil, yet within any category of glacial till, it is possible to make some observations which help identify the type of till and how it will behave, as shown in Figure 6, a ternary diagram highlighting the relationship between particle size distribution and description. The principles of soil classification for engineering purposes are based on particle size distribution, plasticity, organic content and genesis. There are four categories of soil types: very coarse-grained, coarse-grained, fine-grained and organic soils. Glacial tills are often combinations of the first three, making them composite soils. McGown and Derbyshire (1977) suggested a description of tills based on the percentage of fines (Table 3). Gens and Hight (1979), Stephenson et al. (1988) and Al-Moadhen et al. (2017) showed that the behaviour of a composite soil is determined by the percentage of coarse-grained soils. A soil will behave as a fine-grained soil (matrix-dominated till) if the coarse-grained content is less than 85% and as a coarse-grained soil (clast-dominated till) if the coarse content exceeds 85%. The transition zone between the matrix-dominated and clast-dominated till will depend on the confining stress and clay type (Al-Moadhen et al., 2017). Thus, the description of a till based on engineering classification schemes may not be consistent with the engineering behaviour since a soil is classified as fine-grained if there is more than 40% by weight of silt and/or clay (BS EN ISO 14688-1:2004+A1:2013 (BSI, 2004a)), whereas it can behave as a fine-grained soil if there is more than 15% by weight.

Figure 6

Ternary diagrams showing (a) the range of soils composition and their relation to engineering descriptions and (b) the composition of a number of UK tills (after Trenter (1999))

Figure 6

Ternary diagrams showing (a) the range of soils composition and their relation to engineering descriptions and (b) the composition of a number of UK tills (after Trenter (1999))

Close Figure 6
Table 3

Relation between percentage of fines and type of till (modified from McGown and Derbyshire (1977))

Dominant soil fractionNature of dominant fraction% of finesTextural descriptionComposite soil behaviour
ClastsCoarse0–15GranularClast dominated
Non-dominant fraction 15–45Well gradedEither matrix or clast depending on confining stress
MatrixCoarse45–70Granular matrixMatrix dominated
 Fine70–100Cohesive matrix 

Some matrix-dominated tills may exhibit a strength index (undrained shear strength) in excess of 300 kPa, which means that they are classified as weak rock according to BS EN ISO 14688-2:2004+A1:2013, although these are likely to be described as a soil.

The limits are based on the fraction of fine-grained soil and the water content on the whole mass. For composite soils, the consistency limits will be based on the matrix, so any correlations with engineering properties will be based on the matrix properties using the mass water content – that is, published correlations for fine-grained soils may not be relevant.

The A-line on the Casagrande chart, based on experimental evidence, separates clays from silts. Erosion products include clay minerals and rock flour depending on the source material and the degree of weathering such that the consistency limits of many glacial soils lie astride the T-line (Figure 7) defined as

1

where PI is the plasticity index and I L is the liquid limit. The T-line lies above the A-line, suggesting that the matrix is a clay, whereas the evidence is that they can be combinations of clays, silts or rock flour.

Figure 7

Consistency limits for UK matrix-dominated tills and clay minerals (after Trenter (1999) and Clarke et al. (2008)) showing the T-line (Boulton and Paul, 1976). C, clay; H, high plasticity; I, intermediate plasticity; L, low plasticity; M, silt; V, very high plasticity

Figure 7

Consistency limits for UK matrix-dominated tills and clay minerals (after Trenter (1999) and Clarke et al. (2008)) showing the T-line (Boulton and Paul, 1976). C, clay; H, high plasticity; I, intermediate plasticity; L, low plasticity; M, silt; V, very high plasticity

Close Figure 7

Glacial tills weather by oxidation, hydration, leaching and mechanical disintegration (Eyles and Sladen, 1981; Sladen and Wrigley, 1983), which leads to increased silt and clay content by disintegration and formation of clay minerals due to chemical weathering (Sladen and Wrigley, 1983). A weathered till tends to have a higher water content, lower density and a greater plasticity than the underlying, unweathered till (e.g. Bell and Forster, 1991; Clarke et al., 2008; McKinlay et al., 1974; Robertson et al., 1994).

Soils can be described as even-graded soils (Table 4), in which the particles are of a similar size (e.g. even-graded sand); multigraded soils (e.g. glacial tills); and gap-graded soils (e.g. bimodal glacial tills). Multigraded and gap-graded soils are likely to be composite soils. The theoretical maximum density of a composite soil varies between 1·92 and 2·30 Mg/m3 for a water content of 30–10% assuming a particle density of 2·65 Mg/m3 (Clarke, 2017). The in situ densities of glacial tills (other than melt-out tills) created by the deposition processes of compression, shear and abrasion are similar to the theoretical densities as are the water contents.

Table 4

The shapes of grading curves of glacial tills (after BS EN ISO 14688-2:2004+A1:2013 (BSI, 2002))

DescriptionC uC c
Multigraded>151 < C c < 3
Medium graded6–15<1
Even graded<6<1
Gap gradedUsually highAny (usually <0·5)

The density, composition and fabric of subglacial traction tills make it difficult to retrieve quality samples. The spatial variability of tills makes it difficult to select representative samples. The size of samples in relation to the fabric makes it difficult to determine the mass strength, stiffness and permeability of these tills. Therefore, it is prudent to use frameworks developed for composite soils to assess the quality of the results and select design parameters.

The primary or intrinsic hydraulic conductivity, k h, of a soil can be determined in the laboratory by using reconstituted samples consolidated to the same density as the in situ density. Al-Moadhen et al. (2018) undertook tests on composite soils and compared the results to published data to produce Figure 8, which shows that matrix-dominated tills with a fine-grained content in excess of 35% have a conductivity of less than 10−9 m/s. The conductivity of clast-dominated soils is typically greater than 10−7 m/s. There is a transition zone between these two, which depends on the soil density, type of fine-grained particle and confining pressure.

Figure 8

A comparison between the experimental observations of coefficient of hydraulic conductivity of composite soils (after Al-Moadhen et al. (2018)) and those reported by Stephenson et al. (1988) for glacial soils

Figure 8

A comparison between the experimental observations of coefficient of hydraulic conductivity of composite soils (after Al-Moadhen et al. (2018)) and those reported by Stephenson et al. (1988) for glacial soils

Close Figure 8

Al-Moadhen et al. (2018) showed that the k h of composite soils, both plastic and non-plastic, is stress dependent and decreases with fine-grained content. The data, replotted in Figure 9 using the matrix void ratio (e m = volume of voids/volume of fine-grained particles), show that for a fine-grained content in excess of 30%, the variation in hydraulic conductivity with effective stress falls within a narrow band – that is, it is the matrix that dominates the permeability of the soil. This is consistent with the concept that flow is governed by the fine-grained matrix, with the coarse-grained particles having little effect provided that the coarse-grained content is less than 30%. The k h of fine-grained soils depends on the activity, A, and matrix void ratio, e m

2
Figure 9

The variation in hydraulic conductivity of matrix-dominated soils with (a) the global void ratio and liquid limit and (b) the matrix void ratio and activity (after Al-Moadhen et al. (2017))

Figure 9

The variation in hydraulic conductivity of matrix-dominated soils with (a) the global void ratio and liquid limit and (b) the matrix void ratio and activity (after Al-Moadhen et al. (2017))

Close Figure 9

Thevanayagam (1998) and others suggested that the shear behaviour of clast-dominated composite soils is a function of the intergranular void ratio (e i = (volume of voids + volume of fine-grained particles)/volume of coarse-grained particles). This also applies to hydraulic conductivity (Figure 10) even though the intergranular void ratio includes the fine-grained volume. The hydraulic conductivity of coarse-grained soils is a function of d 10 (Hazen, 1892) and the intergranular void ratio, e i

3
Figure 10

The variation in hydraulic conductivity of clast-dominated soils with (a) the global void ratio and (b) the intergranular void ratio (after Al-Moadhen et al. (2017))

Figure 10

The variation in hydraulic conductivity of clast-dominated soils with (a) the global void ratio and (b) the intergranular void ratio (after Al-Moadhen et al. (2017))

Close Figure 10

Inspection of the data from the paper by Stephenson et al. (1988) also shows that for soils with less than 10% clay content (Figure 11) and less than 75% coarse-grained content – that is, the fine-grained content is predominantly silt – the hydraulic conductivity is the same as that for the transition zone, which is typically between 10−7 and 10−9 m/s.

Figure 11

A relationship between the composition of composite soils and the coefficient of hydraulic conductivity showing that there are four distinct zones: matrix-dominated soils, clast-dominated soils, the transition between matrix- and clast-dominated soils and soils that are predominantly formed of silt (after Al-Moadhen et al. (2018))

Figure 11

A relationship between the composition of composite soils and the coefficient of hydraulic conductivity showing that there are four distinct zones: matrix-dominated soils, clast-dominated soils, the transition between matrix- and clast-dominated soils and soils that are predominantly formed of silt (after Al-Moadhen et al. (2018))

Close Figure 11

The mass (in situ) permeability of glacial tills is a function of the intrinsic conductivity and the secondary conductivity, which is a function of the soil fabric, which in glacial soils can have a significant effect (e.g. Keller et al., 1986; Little, 1984; McKay et al., 1993; Sims et al., 1996). Thus, the mass permeability is likely to exceed the intrinsic permeability. Further, matrix-dominated tills contain discontinuities that vary in width with depth. Sims et al. (1996) suggested that fissures within matrix-dominated tills have a significant effect on the permeability but the effect reduces with depth because the density of fissuring decreases with depth and the in situ stress increases, closing the fissures such that if the effective stress exceeded 120 kPa (that is about 12 m), the in situ conductivities of the intact and fissured clay are similar. The permeability of clast-dominated and melt-out tills is highly variable because of the variability in composition, and glacial tills can contain lenses of more permeable materials, which have significantly different conductivity to the surrounding soil.

Stiffness

Stiffness is the most difficult parameter to assess (BS EN 1997-1:2004+A1:2013 (BSI, 2004b)). It is possible to assess the module decay curve from triaxial tests on class 1 samples by using local strain measurements (Atkinson and Little 1988; Chegini and Trenter, 1996; Finno and Cho, 2010; Hird et al., 1991; Long and Menkiti, 2007). This could be attributed to the fabric as well as the effects of sampling very dense soils. It has generally been observed that results from tests on quality samples provide data that are consistent with in situ measurements but the predicted decay curves may be less than those back-figured from field observations.

Published correlations of the variation in the global compression index, Cc-g, with liquid limit (Figure 12) show that for a liquid limit less than 40%, there is reasonable agreement with the empirical correlations proposed by Skempton and Jones (1944), Terzaghi et al. (1996) and Sridharan and Nagaraj (2000). However, Cc-g is also dependent on the stress state such that

4

where eg100 is the global void ratio at an effective stress of 100 kPa and eL is the void ratio at the liquid limit. Al-Moadhen and Clarke (personal communication) found a linear relationship between the matrix void ratio, em, and the effective vertical stress for matrix-dominated soils. An implication of this conclusion is that it is possible to test reconstituted composite soils to determine the mechanical characteristics to overcome the difficulty of recovering sandy, gravelly clay, for example, since the coarse-grained content has a significant impact on the behaviour of a small test sample although the behaviour in situ may be largely unaffected by the coarse-grained content. This is the procedure recommended by Atkinson et al. (1985), Lewin and Powell (1985) and Clarke et al. (1997) for testing clay matrix-dominated tills as the effects of fabric and large coarse particles are removed, leading to more consistent results. While more consistent results may be obtained, they are likely to be a lower bound to the in situ mass values.

Figure 12

The global compression index of composite soils: (a) compared with published empirical correlations; (b) as a function of liquid limit and void ratio at 100 kPa pressure (after Al-Moadhen and Clarke (personal communication))

Figure 12

The global compression index of composite soils: (a) compared with published empirical correlations; (b) as a function of liquid limit and void ratio at 100 kPa pressure (after Al-Moadhen and Clarke (personal communication))

Close Figure 12

Further, Al-Moadhen and Clarke (personal communication) showed that the coefficient of volume compressibility, mv, is related to the dry density. A reduction in mv is associated with an increase in fine-grained content and an increase in the dry density, ϒd, for matrix-dominated soils. Al-Moadhen and Clarke (personal communication) showed that

5

where [e = 16·45(IL)−1·19; f = 1·422(IL)−1·534] for composite soils and [e = 19·78(IL)−0·816; f = 1·696(IL)−1·176] for matrix-dominated soils.

Undrained shear strength

The density of matrix-dominated tills is such that the soil skeleton is so stiff that some of the load is taken by the soil particles, which means that during undrained loading of a saturated sample, the pore pressure will be less than the confining pressure in a triaxial test. Therefore, if unconsolidated undrained tests are carried out on samples of saturated till with the same density and water content at three different confining pressures, a low angle of friction and high cohesion are obtained (Figure 13(b)). This is an unsafe result. It is better to interpret unconsolidated undrained tests as fully undrained tests, quoting the average deviator stress at failure.

Figure 13

The effects of (a) the assumed failure model and (b) the fabric and composition of glacial tills have on the interpreted effective strength parameters from consolidated tests on those tills showing how c′ can be overestimated and φ′ can be underestimated, producing (c) scatter in standard test results (after Clarke (2017))

Figure 13

The effects of (a) the assumed failure model and (b) the fabric and composition of glacial tills have on the interpreted effective strength parameters from consolidated tests on those tills showing how c′ can be overestimated and φ′ can be underestimated, producing (c) scatter in standard test results (after Clarke (2017))

Close Figure 13

This is further complicated if a till is fissured and/or contains gravel since this can influence the failure mechanism. McGown et al. (1977) suggested that the ratio of fissured strength to intact strength varies with the volume of the specimen (Figure 14).

Figure 14

Effect of specimen size on strength of fissured tills highlighting the need to test larger specimens (after McGown et al. (1977))

Figure 14

Effect of specimen size on strength of fissured tills highlighting the need to test larger specimens (after McGown et al. (1977))

Close Figure 14

Most subglacial tills have a low sensitivity (<8) (Anderson, 1974; Bell, 2002; McGown, 1975) because of the remoulding that took place during deposition. Skempton and Bishop (1954), Skempton and Brown (1961), Bishop and Vaughan (1962), Vaughan et al. (1975) and Vaughan et al. (1978) all showed that the remoulded strength was a reasonable estimate of the in situ strength provided that the remoulded sample had the same density as the in situ soil.

The profile of undrained shear strength with depth shown in Figure 2 is typical of most matrix-dominated tills (e.g. Clarke, 2017; Griffiths and Martin, 2017). The scatter is attributed to natural variation in water content (Millmore and McNicol, 1983; Vaughan et al., 1978) and density, a consequence of the deformation process, the impact of fabric and composition on the failure and the consequences of sampling and testing composite soils. In order to reduce the scatter, do the following.

  • Test 100 mm dia. samples to determine the undrained shear strength for each sample.

  • Assess the fabric of each sample and determine whether this influenced the failure. If the fabrics are significant, disregard the results. Note that this applies to the sample only; the mass strength should take into account the fabric.

  • Group the results according to their liquidity index, water content, density and fabric to remove any outliers.

This procedure reduces the scatter in the data, making the selection of a design profile possible.

An alternative method is to test reconstituted soil consolidated to the in situ density. This removes the effects of fabric and composition to produce the intrinsic strength of the matrix. The design strength will be less than the intrinsic strength to take into account the effects of fabric (Figure 13).

Effective strength

Effective stress tests on a fully saturated clay show that these soils have a non-linear failure envelope (Figure 13(a)) which is considered linear over the typical stress ranges found in practice. Tests on fissured soils or soils containing a range of particle sizes may produce high values or even negative values of cohesion because of the influence of discontinuities/coarse particles on the failure mechanism of each specimen (Figure 13). The effect of fabric on sampling and testing and the interpretation of the test, which is a simple curve-fitting routine, suggest that scatter is inevitable (Figure 15).

Figure 15

A comparison between the failure envelope from tests on undisturbed and reconstituted samples of glacial till showing that the tests on reconstituted samples produce a lower bound to the field specimens provided that the density is similar

Figure 15

A comparison between the failure envelope from tests on undisturbed and reconstituted samples of glacial till showing that the tests on reconstituted samples produce a lower bound to the field specimens provided that the density is similar

Close Figure 15

For these reasons, values of cohesion and angle of friction derived from standard tests should be treated with caution. There are a number of ways to obtain more representative values.

  • Plot the deviator stress and mean stress at failure of all tests on specimens from the same stratum. This may mean more tests are required to be significant. In an ideal situation, the results would lie on a line, possibly curved (Figure 15).

  • Brooker and Ireland (1965), Ladd et al. (1977) and Terzaghi et al. (1996) suggested a relation between the angle of friction and PI which shows that an increase in clay content reduces the angle. The range of PIs in Figure 7 suggests that the angle of friction of glacial tills would vary between 25 and 35° (Figure 16). Data from various sources suggest that the results of triaxial tests on a glacial till do lie about the predicted relationship, but the scatter in the data suggests caution.

  • Stark et al. (2005) suggested that the angle of friction is a function of the clay mineralogy (expressed in terms of the liquid limit), clay fraction and the density (expressed in terms of the confining stress), consistent with the concept of a non-linear failure envelope (Figure 17). This is recommended by BS 8004:2015 (BSI, 2015).

  • Sorensen and Okkels (2013) undertook tests on range of composite soils to show that for stiff matrix-dominated soils (i.e. soils with a clay fraction less than 80%), the best estimate and lower bound angle of friction, φ′, for composite soils with (4% < PI <50%) is given by

    6
  • Subglacial tills have a low plasticity; therefore, according to Lupini et al. (1981), these tills should exhibit turbulent shear with little reduction in strength, which is consistent with the view that subtraction tills were remoulded during deposition. Since the tills were remoulded, Atkinson et al. (1985), Lewin and Powell (1985), Chegini and Trenter (1996) and Clarke et al. (1997) suggested that tests can be carried out on reconstituted till at the same density as the natural till. The effects of fabric and large coarse particles are removed, leading to more consistent results, although fabric will have to be considered when selecting a design value.

Figure 16

The variation in angle of friction with PI for UK glacial tills compared to that suggested by Terzaghi et al. (1996) showing the scatter in the results due to fabric, composition and interpretation (after Trenter (1999))

Figure 16

The variation in angle of friction with PI for UK glacial tills compared to that suggested by Terzaghi et al. (1996) showing the scatter in the results due to fabric, composition and interpretation (after Trenter (1999))

Close Figure 16
Figure 17

Variation in fully softened angles of friction with clay fraction and liquid limit (after Stark et al. (2005))

Figure 17

Variation in fully softened angles of friction with clay fraction and liquid limit (after Stark et al. (2005))

Close Figure 17

Given the stiffness of subglacial tills, sensitivity of strength to water content and the difficulty of establishing the stress history, it would appear that tests on reconstituted matrix-dominated tills should provide a reasonable assessment of the characteristic effective strength provided that the specimens are reconstituted at the in situ water content and consolidated to the in situ density. The values obtained are likely to be a lower bound to the in situ intact values but do not include the effect of fabric. The main advantage of this approach is to remove the gravels, which, in situ, will have little effect on mass strength because of their random distribution and quantity but will influence the strength of laboratory specimens.

A review of the formation of glacial tills has highlighted a number of points that should be considered when engineering these soils.

  • Glacial tills can contain boulders, cobbles, gravel, sands, silts and clays – that is, they are composite soils containing a mix of very coarse-, coarse- and fine-grained particles. Clay size particles can be formed of clay minerals or rock flour depending on the source rock.

  • Boulders, cobbles and gravel have a significant effect on the quality of a sample and test results but, in situ, may have little effect on the behaviour of the glacial soils. It depends on the quantity and whether they are randomly distributed throughout the soil or not. However, they impact on construction, which is affected by local anomalies.

  • A description based on an engineering classification (i.e. the dominant particle type) does not necessarily describe the engineering behaviour of a glacial till since the fine-grained content, as little as 15%, has a significant influence.

  • Glacial tills can be either matrix-dominated soils (at least 35% fine-grained content), which have characteristics similar to those of fine-grained soils, or clast-dominated soils (less than 15% fine-grained content), which have characteristics similar to those of coarse-grained soils. The behaviour of glacial tills with fine-grained content between 15 and 35% will depend on the confining stress.

  • Glacial tills were transported by ice, but the composition and fabric will depend on whether they were deformed during deposition (subtraction tills) or were deposited gravitationally during a period of deglaciation (melt-out tills). They are spatially variable both vertically and horizontally, because of these depositional processes.

  • The deposition and postdepositional processes mean that matrix-dominated tills can contain discontinuities and randomly distributed coarse particles, which will impact on the quality of a sample. Tests should be carried out on as large as samples as possible, which means more samples are required than suggested by standards.

  • Discontinuities will reduce the strength and stiffness and increase the permeability of matrix-dominated tills. These discontinuities can open up during excavation, further increasing the permeability.

  • It is likely that laboratory tests to determine geotechnical characteristics will be based on reconstituted glaciofluvial soils, clast-dominated tills and, possibly, matrix-dominated tills. It is important to carry out the tests at the in situ density.

  • The effective strength of tills should be based on tests on a large number of samples rather than specimens from one sample to overcome the difficulty of obtaining representative samples.

  • Matrix-dominated tills are remoulded during deposition so that these can be reconstituted to the in situ density to give the intact properties of the till, thus removing the effects of fabric and coarse grains. The results may have to be adjusted to take into account fabric.

  • Correlations developed between geotechnical properties and consistency limits for sedimented clays may not apply to matrix-dominated tills because of the different mode of deposition.

  • In situ and laboratory test results should not be expected to give the same results. Site-specific correlations need to be developed to relate in situ penetration test results to geotechnical characteristics.

Glacial tills are difficult to sample and test because they are very dense (strong) and fissile and contain gravel. A full description of a glacial till should be based on (a) its mode of deposition (e.g. Giles et al., 2017), (b) an engineering classification scheme (e.g. BS EN ISO 14688-1:2002) and (c) its engineering behaviour (e.g. Clarke, 2017) because the simple model of gravitational consolidation in a marine environment does not describe the formation of glacial till.

When planning an investigation it is necessary to consider the following.

  • The number of boreholes, samples and in situ tests should exceed those recommended in standards to take account of the impact that fabric and composition can have on the results.

  • An initial investigation is necessary to determine the spatial variability of the deposits so that the main investigation can be designed to obtain representative samples which should be as large as possible to overcome the influence of fabric and composition.

  • Methods of sampling, testing and interpretation have a significant effect on the geotechnical characteristics derived from the investigation; hence, more samples than those suggested in standards should be taken.

  • The results should be validated using appropriate frameworks.

Alley
 
RB
 
1989
 
Water-pressure coupling of sliding and bed deformation: I. water system
 
Journal of Glaciology
 
35
 
119
 
108
 -
118
 
Alley
 
RB
 
1993
 
In search of ice-stream sticky spots
 
Journal of Glaciology
 
39
 
133
 
447
 -
454
 
Al-Moadhen
 
M
,
Clarke
 
BG
,
Chen
 
X
 
2017
 
Hydraulic conductivity of composite soils
 
Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Coupled Phenomena in Environmental Geotechnics (CPEG2)
 
6 September
 
University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Al-Moadhen
 
M
,
Clarke
 
BG
,
Chen
 
X
 
2018
 
The permeability of composite soils
 
Environmental Geotechnics
(
in press
)
Anderson
 
WF
 
1974
 
The use of multi-stage triaxial tests to find the undrained strength parameters of stony boulder clay
 
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers
 
57
 
2
 
367
 -
372
 
Andrews
 
JT
 
1971
 
Techniques of Till Fabric Analysis
 
British Geomorphological Research Group
 
London, UK
 
Geo Abstracts for the British Geomorphological Research Group No. 1-10
Ansted
 
DT
 
1888
 
River beds, river banks and results of river action
 
Water and Water Supply: Chiefly in Reference to the British Isles
 
Ansted
 
DT
 
Thomas Telford
 
London, UK
 
chapter XVIII, reprinted 2015
Atkinson
 
JH
,
Little
 
JA
 
1988
 
Undrained triaxial strength and stress–strain characteristics of a glacial till soil
 
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
 
25
 
3
 
428
 -
439
 
Atkinson
 
JH
,
Lewin
 
PI
,
Ng
 
CL
 
1985
 
Undrained strength and overconsolidation of a clay till
 
Proceedings of the International Conference on Construction in Glacial Tills and Boulder Clays
 
Edinburgh, UK
 
49
 -
54
Banham
 
PH
 
1977
 
Glacitectonites in till stratigraphy
 
Boreas
 
6
 
2
 
101
 -
105
 
Bell
 
FG
 
2002
 
The geotechnical properties of some till deposits occurring along the coastal areas of eastern England
 
Engineering Geology
 
63
 
1
 
49
 -
68
 
Bell
 
FG
,
Forster
 
A
 
1991
 
The Geotechnical Characteristics of the Till Deposits of Holderness
 
Geological Society
 
London, UK
 
Engineering Geology Special Publications 7, no. 1
 
111
 -
118
Benn
 
DI
 
1995
 
Fabric signature of subglacial till deformation, Breidamerkurjökull, Iceland
 
Sedimentology
 
42
 
5
 
735
 -
747
 
Benn
 
DI
,
Evans
 
DJA
 
1996
 
The interpretation and classification of subglacially-deformed materials
 
Quaternary Science Reviews
 
15
 
1
 
23
 -
52
 
Benn
 
DI
,
Evans
 
DJA
 
2010
 
Glaciers and Glaciation
 
Routledge
 
London, UK
Bishop
 
AW
,
Vaughan
 
PR
 
1962
 
Selset Reservoir: design and performance of the embankment
 
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers
 
21
 
2
 
305
 -
346
 
Boulton
 
GS
 
1996
 
Theory of glacial erosion, transport and deposition as a consequence of subglacial sediment deformation
 
Journal of Glaciology
 
42
 
140
 
43
 -
62
 
Boulton
 
GS
,
Hindmarsh
 
RCA
 
1987
 
Sediment deformation beneath glaciers: rheology and geological consequences
 
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
 
92
 
B9
 
9059
 -
9082
 
Boulton
 
GS
,
Jones
 
AS
 
1979
 
Stability of temperate ice caps and ice sheets resting on beds of deformable sediment
 
Journal of Glaciology
 
24
 
90
 
29
 -
43
 
Boulton
 
GS
,
Paul
 
MA
 
1976
 
The influence of genetic processes on some geotechnical properties of glacial tills
 
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology
 
9
 
3
 
159
 -
194
Boulton
 
GS
,
Slot
 
T
,
Blessing
 
K
, et al
 
1994
 
Deep circulation of groundwater in overpressured subglacial aquifers and its geological consequences
 
Quaternary Science Reviews
 
12
 
9
 
739
 -
745
 
Boulton
 
GS
,
Dobbie
 
KE
,
Zatsepin
 
S
 
2001
 
Sediment deformation beneath glaciers and its coupling to the sub glacial hydraulic system
 
Quaternary International
 
86
 
1
 
3
 -
28
 
Brooker
 
EW
,
Ireland
 
HO
 
1965
 
Earth pressures at rest related to stress history
 
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
 
2
 
1
 
1
 -
15
 
Brown
 
NE
,
Hallet
 
B
,
Booth
 
DB
 
1987
 
Rapid soft bed sliding of the Puget Glacial Lobe
 
Journal of Geophysical Research
 
92
 
B9
 
8985
 -
8997
 
BSI
 
2002
 
BS EN ISO 14688-1:2002+A1:2013: Geotechnical investigation and testing. Identification and classification of soil. Identification and description
 
BSI
 
London, UK
BSI
 
2004a
 
BS EN ISO 14688-2:2004+A1:2013: Geotechnical investigation and testing. Identification and classification of soil. Principles for a classification
 
BSI
 
London, UK
BSI
 
2004b
 
BS EN 1997-1:2004+A1:2013: Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design. General rules
 
BSI
 
London, UK
BSI
 
2009
 
BS 6031:2009: Code of practice for earthworks
 
BSI
 
London, UK
BSI
 
2015
 
BS 8004:2015: Code of practice for foundations
 
BSI
 
London, UK
Carr
 
SJ
,
Rose
 
J
 
2003
 
Till fabric patterns and significance: particle response to subglacial stress
 
Quaternary Science Reviews
 
22
 
14
 
1415
 -
1426
 
Chegini
 
A
,
Trenter
 
NA
 
1996
 
The shear strength and deformation behaviour of a glacial till
 
Proceedings of the Conference on Advances in Site Investigation Practice
 
London, UK
 
851
 -
866
Clark
 
CD
 
1997
 
Reconstructing the evolutionary dynamics of former ice sheets using multi-temporal evidence, remote sensing and GIS
 
Quaternary Science Reviews
 
16
 
9
 
1067
 -
1092
 
Clarke
 
BG
 
2017
 
Engineering of Glacial Deposits
 
CRC Press
 
London, UK
Clark
 
PU
,
Walder
 
JS
 
1994
 
Subglacial drainage, eskers, and deforming beds beneath the Laurentide and Eurasian ice sheets
 
Geological Society of America Bulletin
 
106
 
2
 
304
 -
314
 
Clarke
 
BG
,
Aflaki
 
E
,
Hughes
 
DB
 
1997
 
A framework for characterisation of glacial tills
 
Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering
 
Hamburg, Germany
 
263
 -
266
Clarke
 
BG
,
Hughes
 
DB
,
Hashemi
 
S
 
2008
 
Physical characteristics of subglacial tills
 
Géotechnique
 
58
 
1
 
67
 -
76
 
Culshaw
 
MG
,
Entwisle
 
DC
,
Giles
 
DP
, et al
 
2017
 
Material properties and geohazards
 
Engineering Geology and Geomorphology of Glaciated and Periglaciated Terrains – Engineering Group Working Party Report
 
Griffiths
 
JS
,
Martin
 
CJ
 
Geological Society
 
London, UK
 
Engineering Geology Special Publications 28
 
599
 -
740
Derbyshire
 
E
,
Edge
 
NJ
,
Love
 
ML
 
1985
 
Soil fabric variability in some glacial soils
 
Proceedings of the International Conference on Construction in Glacial Tills and Boulder Clays
 
Edinburgh, UK
 
169
 -
176
Dowdeswell
 
JA
,
Sharp
 
MJ
 
1986
 
Characterization of pebble fabrics in modern terrestrial glacigenic sediments
 
Sedimentology
 
33
 
5
 
699
 -
710
Dowdeswell
 
JA
,
Hambrey
 
MJ
,
Wu
 
R
 
1985
 
A comparison of clast fabric and shape in Late Precambrian and modern glacigenic sediments
 
Journal of Sedimentary Research
 
55
 
5
 
691
 -
704
Dreimanis
 
A
 
1989
 
Tills: their genetic terminology and classification
 
Genetic Classification of Glacigenic Deposits
 
Goldthwait
 
RF
,
Matsch
 
CL
 
Balkema
 
Rotterdam, the Netherlands
 
17
 -
83
Elson
 
JA
 
1961
 
The Geology of Tills
 
Associate Committee on Soil and Snow Mechanics, National Research Council of Canada
 
Ottawa, ON, Canada
Evans
 
DJA
,
Phillips
 
ER
,
Hiemstra
 
JF
,
Auton
 
CA
 
2006
 
Subglacial till: formation, sedimentary characteristics and classification
 
Earth-science Reviews
 
78
 
1
 
115
 -
176
Eyles
 
N
,
Sladen
 
JA
 
1981
 
Stratigraphy and geotechnical properties of weathered lodgement till in Northumberland, England
 
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
 
14
 
2
 
129
 -
141
 
Finno
 
RJ
,
Cho
 
W
 
2010
 
Recent stress-history effects on compressible Chicago glacial clays
 
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
 
137
 
3
 
197
 -
207
Fischer
 
UH
,
Clarke
 
GKC
 
1997
 
Stick-slip sliding behaviour at the base of a glacier
 
Annals of Glaciology
 
24
 
390
 -
396
 
Gens
 
A
,
Hight
 
DW
 
1979
 
The laboratory measurement of design parameters for a glacial till
 
Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering
 
Brighton, UK
 
2
 
57
 -
65
Giles
 
DP
,
Griffiths
 
JS
,
Evans
 
DJA
,
Murton
 
JB
 
2017
 
Geomorphological framework: glacial and periglacial sediments, structures and landforms
 
Engineering Geology and Geomorphology of Glaciated and Periglaciated Terrains – Engineering Group Working Party Report
 
Griffiths
 
JS
,
Martin
 
CJ
 
Geological Society
 
London, UK
 
Engineering Geology Special Publications 28
 
59
 -
368
Glen
 
JW
,
Donner
 
JJ
,
West
 
RG
 
1957
 
On the mechanism by which stones in till become oriented
 
American Journal of Science
 
255
 
3
 
194
 -
205
Griffiths
 
JS
,
Martin
 
CJ
 
2017
 
Engineering Geology and Geomorphology of Glaciated and Periglaciated Terrains – Engineering Group Working Party Report
 
Geological Society
 
London, UK
 
Engineering Geology Special Publications 28
Hallet
 
B
 
1979
 
A theoretical model of glacial abrasion
 
Journal of Glaciology
 
23
 
89
 
39
 -
50
 
Hallet
 
B
,
Anderson
 
RS
 
1980
 
Detailed glacial geomorphology of a proglacial bedrock area at Castleguard Glacier, Alberta, Canada
 
Zeitschrift fur Gletscherkunde und Glazialgeologie
 
16
 
171
 -
184
Hart
 
JK
 
1994
 
Proglacial glaciotectonic deformation at Melabakkar-Ásbakkar, west Iceland
 
Boreas
 
23
 
2
 
112
 -
121
 
Hart
 
JK
 
1995
 
Subglacial erosion, deposition and deformation associated with deformable beds
 
Progress in Physical Geography
 
19
 
2
 
173
 -
191
 
Hart
 
JK
 
2006
 
Athabasca Glacier, Canada – a field example of subglacial ice and till erosion?
 
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
 
31
 
1
 
65
 -
80
 
Hart
 
JK
,
Boulton
 
GS
 
1991
 
The interrelation of glaciotectonic and glaciodepositional processes within the glacial environment
 
Quaternary Science Reviews
 
10
 
4
 
335
 -
350
 
Hart
 
JK
,
Khatwa
 
A
,
Sammonds
 
P
 
2004
 
The effect of grain texture on the occurrence of microstructural properties in subglacial till
 
Quaternary Science Reviews
 
23
 
23
 
2501
 -
2512
 
Hazen
 
A
 
1892
 
Some Physical Properties of Sands and Gravels: with Special Reference to Their Use in Filtration
 
State Board of Health in Massachusetts
 
Boston, MA, USA
Head
 
KH
 
1984
 
Manual of Soil Laboratory Testing, Vol. 1, Soil Classification and Compaction Tests
 
Pentech
 
London, UK
Hicock
 
SR
 
1992
 
Lobal interactions and rheologic superposition in subglacial till near Bradtville, Ontario, Canada
 
Boreas
 
21
 
1
 
73
 -
88
 
Hicock
 
SR
,
Goff
 
JR
,
Lian
 
OB
,
Little
 
EC
 
1996
 
On the interpretation of subglacial till fabric
 
Journal of Sedimentary Research
 
66
 
5
 
928
 -
934
Hird
 
CC
,
Powell
 
JJM
,
Yung
 
PCY
 
1991
 
Investigations of the stiffness of a glacial clay till
 
Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering
 
Florence, Italy
 
107
 -
110
Iken
 
A
,
Bindschadler
 
RA
 
1986
 
Combined measurements of subglacial water pressure and surface velocity of Findelengletscher, Switzerland: conclusions about drainage system and sliding mechanism
 
Journal of Glaciology
 
32
 
110
 
101
 -
119
 
Iverson
 
NR
 
2012
 
A theory of glacial quarrying for landscape evolution models
 
Geology
 
40
 
8
 
679
 -
682
 
Iverson
 
NR
,
Hooyer
 
TS
,
Hooke
 
RL
 
1996
 
A laboratory study of sediment deformation: stress heterogeneity and grain-size evolution
 
Annals of Glaciology
 
22
 
1
 
167
 -
175
Kamp
 
B
 
1987
 
Glacier surge mechanism based on linked cavity configuration of the basal water conduit system
 
Journal of Geophysical Research
 
92
 
B9
 
9083
 -
9100
 
Keller
 
CK
,
van der Kamp
 
G
,
Cherry
 
JA
 
1986
 
Fracture permeability and groundwater flow in clayey till near Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
 
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
 
23
 
2
 
229
 -
240
 
Kirkaldie
 
L
,
Talbot
 
JR
 
1992
 
The effects of soil joints on soil mass properties
 
Bulletin of the Association of Engineering Geologists
 
29
 
4
 
415
 -
430
Ladd
 
CC
,
Foott
 
R
,
Ishihara
 
K
,
Schlosser
 
F
,
Poulos
 
HG
 
1977
 
Stress-deformation and strength characteristics, state of the art report
 
Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering
 
Tokyo, Japan
 
2
 
421
 -
494
Lewin
 
PI
,
Powell
 
JJM
 
1985
 
Patterns of stress strain behaviour for a clay till
 
Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering
 
San Francisco, CA, USA
 
553
 -
556
Little
 
JA
 
1984
 
Engineering Properties of Glacial Tills in the Vale of St. Albans. PhD thesis
 
City University
 
London, UK
Long
 
M
,
Menkiti
 
CO
 
2007
 
Geotechnical properties of Dublin Boulder Clay
 
Géotechnique
 
57
 
7
 
595
 -
611
 
Lupini
 
JF
,
Skinner
 
AE
,
Vaughan
 
PR
 
1981
 
The drained residual strength of cohesive soils
 
Géotechnique
 
31
 
2
 
181
 -
213
 
MacAyeal
 
DR
,
Bindschadler
 
RA
,
Scambos
 
TA
 
1995
 
Basal friction of ice stream E, West Antarctica
 
Journal of Glaciology
 
41
 
138
 
247
 -
262
 
Mayne
 
PW
 
1980
 
Cam-clay predictions of undrained shear strength
 
ASCE Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
 
106
 
11
 
1219
 -
1242
McGown
 
A
 
1975
 
Genetic Influences on the Nature and Properties of Basal Melt Out Tills. PhD thesis
 
University of Strathclyde
 
Glasgow, UK
McGown
 
A
,
Derbyshire
 
E
 
1977
 
Genetic influences on the properties of tills
 
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
 
10
 
4
 
389
 -
410
 
McGown
 
A
,
Radwan
 
AM
,
Gabr
 
AWA
 
1977
 
Laboratory testing of fissured and laminated clays
 
Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering
 
Tokyo, Japan
 
205
 -
210
McKay
 
L
,
Cherry
 
JA
,
Gillham
 
RW
 
1993
 
Field experiments in a fractured clay till: 1. hydraulic conductivity and fracture aperture
 
Water Resources Research
 
29
 
4
 
1149
 -
1162
 
McKinlay
 
DG
,
Tomlinson
 
MJ
,
Anderson
 
WF
 
1974
 
Observations on the undrained strength of a glacial till
 
Géotechnique
 
24
 
4
 
503
 -
516
 
Menzies
 
J
 
1989
 
Subglacial hydraulic conditions and their possible impact upon subglacial bed formation
 
Sedimentary Geology
 
62
 
2
 
125
 -
150
 
Millmore
 
JP
,
McNicol
 
R
 
1983
 
Geotechnical aspects of the Kielder Dam
 
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers
 
74
 
4
 
805
 -
836
 
Murray
 
T
,
Dowdeswell
 
JA
 
1992
 
Water throughflow and the physical effects of deformation on sedimentary glacier beds
 
Journal of Geophysical Research
 
97
 
B6
 
8993
 -
9002
 
Nye
 
JF
 
1973
 
Water at the bed of a glacier
 
Symposium on the Hydrology of Glaciers, Cambridge, 7–13 September 1969
 
International Association of Hydrological Sciences
 
London, UK
 
publication no. 95
 
189
 -
194
Omine
 
K
,
Ochiai
 
H
,
Hayashi
 
S
,
Umezaki
 
T
,
Otani
 
J
 
1989
 
Shear properties of clay–sand composite soils
 
Memoirs of the Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu University
 
49
 
4
 
213
 -
228
Pedersen
 
SAS
 
1988
 
Glacitectonite: Brecciated Sediments and Cataclastic Sedimentary Rocks Formed Subglacially
 
Geological Survey of Denmark
 
Copenhagen, Denmark
 
43
Piotrowski
 
JA
,
Larsen
 
NK
,
Junge
 
FW
 
2004
 
Reflections on soft subglacial beds as a mosaic of deforming and stable spots
 
Quaternary Science Reviews
 
23
 
9
 
993
 -
1000
Robertson
 
TL
,
Clarke
 
BG
,
Hughes
 
DB
 
1994
 
Geotechnical properties of Northumberland Till
 
Ground Engineering
 
27
 
10
 
29
 -
34
Rothlisberger
 
H
 
1972
 
Water pressure in intra- and subglacial channels
 
Journal of Glaciology
 
11
 
62
 
177
 -
203
Sharp
 
MJ
,
Gemmell
 
JC
,
Tison
 
J-L
 
1989
 
Structure and stability of the former subglacial drainage system of the Glacier de Tsanfleuron, Switzerland
 
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
 
14
 
2
 
119
 -
134
 
Shreve
 
RL
 
1972
 
Movement of water in glaciers
 
Journal of Glaciology
 
11
 
62
 
205
 -
214
 
Sims
 
JE
,
Elsworth
 
D
,
Cherry
 
JA
 
1996
 
Stress-dependent flow through fractured clay till: a laboratory study
 
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
 
33
 
3
 
449
 -
457
 
Skempton
 
AW
,
Bishop
 
AW
 
1954
 
Soils
 
Building Materials
 
Reiner
 
M
 
North Holland Publishing
 
Amsterdam, the Netherlands
 
417
 -
482
Skempton
 
AW
,
Brown
 
JD
 
1961
 
A landslide in boulder clay at Selset, Yorkshire
 
Géotechnique
 
11
 
4
 
280
 -
293
 
Skempton
 
AW
,
Jones
 
O
 
1944
 
Notes on the compressibility of clays
 
Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society
 
100
 
1–4
 
119
 -
135
 
Sladen
 
JA
,
Wrigley
 
W
 
1983
 
Geotechnical properties of lodgement till – a review
 
Glacial Geology: an Introduction for Engineers and Earth Scientists
 
Eyles
 
N
 
Pergamon Press
 
Oxford, UK
 
184
 -
212
Smart
 
CC
 
1986
 
Some observations on subglacial groundwater
 
Journal of Glaciology
 
32
 
111
 
232
 -
234
 
Sorensen
 
KK
,
Okkels
 
N
 
2013
 
Correlation between drained shear strength and plasticity index of undisturbed overconsolidated clays
 
Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
 
Paris, France
 
1
 -
6
Sridharan
 
A
,
Nagaraj
 
H
 
2000
 
Compressibility behaviour of remoulded, fine-grained soils and correlation with index properties
 
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
 
37
 
3
 
712
 -
722
 
Stark
 
TD
,
Choi
 
H
,
McCone
 
S
 
2005
 
Drained shear strength parameters for analysis of landslides
 
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
 
131
 
5
 
575
 -
588
 
Stephenson
 
DA
,
Fleming
 
AH
,
Mickelson
 
DM
 
1988
 
Glacial deposits
 
Hydrogeology: the Geology of North America
 
2
 
301
 -
314
Stokes
 
CR
,
Clark
 
CD
,
Lian
 
OB
,
Tulaczyk
 
S
 
2007
 
Ice stream sticky spots: a review of their identification and influence beneath contemporary and palaeo-ice streams
 
Earth-science Reviews
 
81
 
3
 
217
 -
249
Terzaghi
 
K
,
Peck
 
RB
 
1967
 
Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice
  (2)  
J Wiley
 
New York, NY, USA
Terzaghi
 
K
,
Peck
 
RB
,
Mesri
 
G
 
1996
 
Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice
  (3)  
Wiley-Interscience
 
New York, NY, USA
Thevanayagam
 
S
 
1998
 
Effect of fines and confining stress on undrained shear strength of silty sands
 
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
 
124
 
6
 
479
 -
491
 
Trenter
 
NA
 
1999
 
Engineering in Glacial Tills
 
Construction Industry Research and Information Association
 
London, UK
van der Meer
 
JJM
,
Menzies
 
J
,
Rose
 
J
 
2003
 
Subglacial till: the deforming glacier bed
 
Quaternary Science Reviews
 
22
 
15
 
1659
 -
1685
 
Vaughan
 
PR
,
Lovenbury
 
HT
,
Horswill
 
P
 
1975
 
The design, construction and performance of Cow Green embankment dam
 
Géotechnique
 
25
 
3
 
555
 -
580
 
Vaughan
 
PR
,
Hight
 
DW
,
Sodha
 
VG
,
Walbancke
 
HJ
 
1978
 
Factors controlling the stability of clay fills in Britain
 
Selected Papers on Geotechnical Engineering by P R Vaughan
 
Vaughan
 
PR
 
Thomas Telford
 
London, UK
 
203
 -
217
Walder
 
JS
,
Hallet
 
B
 
1979
 
Geometry of former sub-glacial water channels and cavities
 
Journal of Glaciology
 
23
 
89
 
335
 -
346
Walder
 
JS
,
Fowler
 
A
 
1994
 
Channelized subglacial drainage over a deformable bed
 
Journal of Glaciology
 
40
 
134
 
3
 -
15
 
Weertman
 
J
 
1972
 
General theory of water flow at the base of a glacier or ice sheet
 
Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics
 
10
 
1
 
287
 -
333
 
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options