Managing risk and making decisions presents an increasing challenge to doctors as they are encouraged to adopt a partnership approach with patients to dealing with risk, within a “risk society” constructed around individuality, uncertainty, blame and responsibility. In‐depth interviews, stimulated by clinical vignettes, were used to explore the key position of doctors within this risk society. Analysis, sensitised through contemporary texts, revealed unexpected findings that portrayed doctors as reflexive jugglers of risk. Discourses in this study revealed indecision and uncertainty, balanced against needs to preserve professional roles and engage patients in addressing risk, whilst preventing widespread harm and conflict. In concluding, the alternative approaches to risk with older people will suggest a more trusting and positive process that presents a real opportunity for truly sharing risk and decisions that benefit both doctor and patient.
Article navigation
1 June 2004
Research Article|
June 01 2004
Managing health risks: junior doctors' views of risk and decision making
Richard Fuller
Richard Fuller
Medical Department for the Elderly, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7247
Print ISSN: 1477-7266
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2004
J Health Organ Manag (2004) 18 (3): 155–178.
Citation
Fuller R (2004), "Managing health risks: junior doctors' views of risk and decision making". J Health Organ Manag, Vol. 18 No. 3 pp. 155–178, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14777260410548419
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Shared Decision-making in Health Care – Achieving Evidence-based Patient Choice (2nd ed.)
Int J Health Care Qual Assur (July,2009)
The creation of risk‐related information: The UK General Medical Council's electronic database
J Health Organ Manag (November,2010)
Quality of documentation during consent procedures in a UK plastic surgery unit
Clinical Governance: An International Journal (September,2003)
A theory‐based proposal to evaluate patient‐centred communication in medical consultations: The Verona Patient‐centred Communication Evaluation scale (VR‐COPE)
Health Education (August,2008)
Psychosocial care within a multidisciplinary breast cancer team
Clinical Governance: An International Journal (December,2005)
Related Chapters
By what Means are Medical Professionals Able to Reject Hostile Environment Policy within the NHS?
Privatisation of Migration Control: Power without Accountability?
The Dark Side of AI: Navigating the Dynamics of Patient Grooming on Doctor–Patient Relationships
Market Grooming: The Dark Side of AI Marketing
Aligning Talent Management with Projects: Oriented Behavior Approach
The Future of Work and Work Design: Research and Practice
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
