Aims to assess the level of agreement between priorities of service provision in 20 discrete clinical areas, as laid out in a district health authority (DHA) purchasing plan, and the views of GPs in the catchment area of that authority and to test for a statistically significant difference between the views of fundholding and non‐fundholding GPs. A 74 per cent response rate was achieved, and analysis suggested that local GPs′ views were broadly in line with their DHA strategy, and that a significant difference existed between the views of fundholders and non‐fundholders in only one treatment area,namely that of lithotripsy. Concludes that the postal questionnaire is a cheap and easy method of assessing the views of GPs on prioritizing issues. As yet there is little difference between fundholding and non‐fundholding GPs in this area of decision making.
Article navigation
1 February 1994
This article was originally published in
Journal of Management in Medicine
Research Article|
February 01 1994
Prioritizing Services: GPs′ Views, Fundholders versus Non‐fundholders
Philip J. Ayres
Philip J. Ayres
Wakefield Healthcare, White Rose House, Wakefield, UK.
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7441
Print ISSN: 0268-9235
© MCB UP Limited
1994
J Manag Med (1994) 8 (1): 56–63.
Citation
Ayres PJ (1994), "Prioritizing Services: GPs′ Views, Fundholders versus Non‐fundholders". J Manag Med, Vol. 8 No. 1 pp. 56–63, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/02689239410052577
Download citation file:
111
Views
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Fundholding in Northern Region: Practice Managers′ Views
J Manag Med (April,1994)
The quality of prescribing in general practice
Int J Health Care Qual Assur (September,1996)
Papers not patients? ‐ unlocking resources, paying for quality
Int J Health Care Qual Assur (July,1997)
General practice partnerships: an exploratory review
J Manag Med (April,1996)
Enabling clinical governance: a primary care audit of prescribing for heart failure in central Auckland, New Zealand
British Journal of Clinical Governance (September,2001)
Related Chapters
Innovative Methods of Gathering Survey Data on Violence Against Women
Methods of Criminology and Criminal Justice Research
A Comprehensive Practical Framework for Assessing Academic Programs in Higher Education
Quality Assurance in Higher Education in the Middle East: Practices and Perspectives
The Impact of an Integrated Assignment on the Engagement of Undergraduate Students with the Content
Advances in Accounting Education: Teaching and Curriculum Innovations
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
