Article navigation
Purpose

This study aims to examine whether Islamicity indices can be applied at the subnational level by analyzing regional variation across Türkiye’s 26 NUTS-2 regions during 2015–2020.

Design/methodology/approach

Islamicity scores were constructed through min-max normalization and equal weighting across economic, legal-governance and human-political rights dimensions, then analyzed with panel-data models and robust standard errors.

Findings

Significant regional disparities emerged: Istanbul and Ankara ranked highest, while eastern and southeastern regions ranked lowest. Gender equality, living conditions and health were the strongest positive correlates of index scores.

Research limitations/implications

The analysis is limited to 2015–2020 and secondary quantitative data, restricting long-run observation and leaving underlying causal processes to future qualitative work.

Practical implications

Results support region-specific policy prioritization in gender equality, health, education and living conditions, especially in persistently low-scoring regions.

Social implications

The findings show that the index captures institutional and socio-economic outcomes rather than personal religiosity, helping reframe debates on justice and regional inequality.

Originality/value

This study extends the Islamicity indices literature beyond cross-country comparisons by offering one of the first subnational applications based on a regional panel for Turkey.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal