There is a dramatic increase in the number of companies whose value lies largely in their intangible assets; with relatively little or no value associated with their tangible assets. Traditional methods of valuation, based on accounting principles, where the value of the firm’s assets is a portion of the value, have systematically undervalued companies such as these. This article discusses the problem of valuing intangibles companies and suggests two approaches to determining their value. It also describes two common circumstances where company value is desired and discusses how value may be determined using a non‐traditional perspective on the company along with traditional methods for valuation. The two circumstances examined are the going‐concern value and the value under merger or acquisition circumstances (recognizing that these two circumstances produce very different valuations for the corporation).
Article navigation
1 December 2000
Review Article|
December 01 2000
Valuing intangibles companies – An intellectual capital approach
Patrick H. Sullivan, Jr;
Patrick H. Sullivan, Jr
ICM Group, Palo Alto, California, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Patrick H. Sullivan, Sr
Patrick H. Sullivan, Sr
ICM Group, Palo Alto, California, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7468
Print ISSN: 1469-1930
© MCB UP Limited
2000
Journal of Intellectual Capital (2000) 1 (4): 328–340.
Citation
Sullivan PH, Sullivan PH (2000), "Valuing intangibles companies – An intellectual capital approach". Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 1 No. 4 pp. 328–340, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930010359234
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
National accounting for intangible assets in the knowledge economy
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance (May,2010)
Measuring intangible corporate assets: Linking business strategy with intellectual capital
Journal of Intellectual Capital (March,2000)
Markets and the Knowledge Economy: Is Anything Broken? Can Government Fix It?
Journal of Knowledge Management (June,1998)
Research and knowledge interaction: Guidelines for intellectual capital reporting
Journal of Intellectual Capital (December,2003)
Accounting for public relations: exploring radical alternatives
Corporate Communications: An International Journal (March,2001)
Related Chapters
Accounting Values, Controversies, and Compromises in Tests of Worth
Justification, Evaluation and Critique in the Study of Organizations: Contributions from French Pragmatist Sociology
Financial Metrics: What you Need to Know
The Emerald Handbook of Modern Information Management
Beyond the Knowledge Economy: Teaching English for Economic Justice
Innovations in English Language Arts Teacher Education
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
