To date, managing intellectual capital has focussed on maximising possibilities to create knowledge, while minimising chances of losing knowledge. However, effective intellectual capital management should consider another dimension: orphan knowledge. Orphan knowledge relates to questions such as: Do organisations “unlearn” things or forget things and repeat past mistakes? Do some organisations unnecessarily duplicate equivalent activities within different areas of the organisation? If orphan knowledge exists, then organisations need to understand their potential for creating orphan knowledge. This paper defines orphan knowledge, and provides evidence of its potential by developing various scenarios and relating case‐study analysis from a sample of Australasian organisations. Indications are that even in organisations considered current “best practice” in managing intellectual capital, there is a medium to high potential for orphan knowledge to be created. Future research will determine whether different knowledge types, namely explicit versus tacit knowledge, have differing potentials for knowledge orphaning. Further research will consider the chief knowledge officer’s role in preventing and recovering organisation orphan knowledge.
Article navigation
1 December 2001
Case Report|
December 01 2001
Managing orphan knowledge: current Australasian best practice Available to Purchase
Ian Caddy;
Ian Caddy
School of Management, University of Western Sydney, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
James Guthrie;
James Guthrie
Macquarie Graduate School of Management, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia, and
Search for other works by this author on:
Richard Petty
Richard Petty
School of Business, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7468
Print ISSN: 1469-1930
© MCB UP Limited
2001
Journal of Intellectual Capital (2001) 2 (4): 384–397.
Citation
Caddy I, Guthrie J, Petty R (2001), "Managing orphan knowledge: current Australasian best practice". Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 2 No. 4 pp. 384–397, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930110409679
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Managing intangible assets – a question of integration and delicate balance
Journal of Intellectual Capital (September,2002)
Success in the Relationship Age: building quality relationship assets for market value creation
The TQM Magazine (February,2002)
Applying artefact‐based criteria to the recognition of “organisational” assets
Journal of Intellectual Capital (October,2010)
Intellectual capital: definitions, categorization and reporting models
Journal of Intellectual Capital (October,2008)
Intellectual capital disclosure payback
Management Decision (August,2011)
Related Chapters
Eco-informatics: The Encouragement of Ecological Data Management
Proceedings of MICoMS 2017
The Territorial Social Responsibility in the City of Volta Redonda, Brazil: The Case of CSN
The Governance of Risk
Intellectual Property: Accounting, IFRS, and Highly Effective Management
Development of International Entrepreneurship Based on Corporate Accounting and Reporting According to IFRS: Part A
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
