Skip to Main Content
Article navigation

Current provision of health and social care for older people reflects a dysfunctional historic legacy of separatism, one with increasingly unacceptable consequences for the quality and cost‐effectiveness of the care provided. However, there is now detailed and encouraging comparative evidence to support the view that more integrated care ‐ delivered jointly, promptly and flexibly to meet the changing clinical and dependency needs of frailer older people at home ‐ can minimise unnecessary use of more costly and less preferable care elsewhere, and thus reduce the overall costs of late‐life care while improving its quality. This paper considers the background to the widely prevailing culture of separatism, presents quantitative evidence of the current postcode lottery in care, describes examples of current good practice, considers some options on functional and structural integration, and speculates on policy that might deliver better and more cost‐effective care for an ageing population at a time of impending stringency in the funding of public services.

This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal