eJudicial cooperation is a goal of EU policy. It appears to offer procedural and technical ICT solutions to enhancing EU security. This paper outlines particular dilemmas posed by operationalising ejudicial cooperation within the EU and its member states, and assesses how political weakness is reconfigured as a problem of technical ethics. The application of biometrics and ICT based ejustice potentially bring the EU closer to the citizen without closing the confidence and trust deficit. The paper first outlines three political dilemmas of ejudicial cooperation: political competence, public accountability, and globalisation imperatives. It examines the rationale for introducing biometric IDs, highlighting a general problem of ejudicial cooperation and egovernance which aggravate the trust deficit. Then, it assesses the technical and managerial procedures to ethical practices for quality justice and security to combat the trust deficits which elude open public accountability and compromise trust.
Article navigation
1 August 2006
Viewpoint|
August 01 2006
Ethical EU eJustice: elusive or illusionary?
Juliet Lodge
Juliet Lodge
Jean Monet European Centre of Excellence, Institute of Communication Studies,University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-8871
Print ISSN: 1477-996X
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2006
Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society (2006) 4 (3): 131–144.
Citation
Lodge J (2006), "Ethical EU eJustice: elusive or illusionary?". Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, Vol. 4 No. 3 pp. 131–144, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14779960680000287
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Assurance for service organisations: contextualising accountability and trust
Managerial Auditing Journal (December,2017)
Situating trust challenges of online trade
Records Management Journal (January,2019)
Understanding accountability in blockchain systems
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal (February,2022)
Biometric Authentication
Sensor Review (December,2003)
Biometric Identification
Sensor Review (December,2003)
Related Chapters
Public Trust in Institutions in Pre- and Post-Crisis Iceland (II): Institutionalised Mistrust
The Return of Trust? Institutions and the Public after the Icelandic Financial Crisis
Ethical Governance of Digital Footprint Data: A Journey Towards a Responsible Society
Business Strategies and Ethical Challenges in the Digital Ecosystem
Quantification, Big Data, and Biometrics in Sport
Sport, Social Media, and Digital Technology: Sociological Approaches
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
