This article sets out to explore three differing approaches from three agencies to supporting and treating people with a learning/intellectual disability who have sexually offended. The three agencies are: Waymarks in the United Kingdom, York Central Hospital Behaviour Management Services and Vita Community Living Services both in Ontario, Canada. Each agency provides services to a similar population of offenders with disabilities. Though each client engaged in vastly different behaviour, all clients have been identified as having sex offending history and as having a high likelihood of offending again in the future. As the organisations evolved, differing approaches to the provision of service developed. For the three agencies, it can be argued that there was a very limited range of theoretical models available when each organisation developed. Consequently each agency developed their service according to the needs and ‘best fit’ of the people they were supporting with the available resources at that time. This meant that services developed as a direct response to the need and were designed to best fit the need with the resources to hand at the time. As a result, three different models of service arose, all of which have had real success with meeting the needs of people with learning/intellectual disabilities who have sexually offended, while providing support and treatment in differing ways. This article will examine some of those differences.
Article navigation
24 January 2011
This article was originally published in
Journal of Learning Disabilities and Offending Behaviour
Review Article|
January 24 2011
Sex offenders with learning disabilities: three responses to the challenge of service provision Available to Purchase
Dave Hingsburger;
Dave Hingsburger
Vita Community Living Services, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Kelly King‐Muir;
Kelly King‐Muir
York Central Hospital Behaviour Management Services, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Manuela Nora;
Manuela Nora
Vita Community Living Services, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Shassha Loftman
Shassha Loftman
York Central Hospital Behaviour Management Services, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 2042-8693
Print ISSN: 2042-0927
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2011
Journal of Learning Disabilities and Offending Behaviour (2011) 2 (1): 42–54.
Citation
Hingsburger D, Flavelle E, Yates J, King‐Muir K, Nora M, Loftman S (2011), "Sex offenders with learning disabilities: three responses to the challenge of service provision". Journal of Learning Disabilities and Offending Behaviour, Vol. 2 No. 1 pp. 42–54, doi: https://doi.org/10.5042/jldob.2011.0027
Download citation file:
6,487
Views
Suggested Reading
Providing forensic community services for people with learning disabilities
Journal of Learning Disabilities and Offending Behaviour (March,2010)
Making a difference? Ten years of managing people with intellectual disability and forensic needs in the community
Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour (December,2015)
Corrections Victoria: ensuring responsive practices for offenders with complex needs
Journal of Learning Disabilities and Offending Behaviour (July,2011)
Arson treatment programmes for offenders with disability: a systematic review of the literature
Journal of Learning Disabilities and Offending Behaviour (November,2012)
The demographics of forced marriage of people with learning disabilities: findings from a national database
The Journal of Adult Protection (March,2020)
Related Chapters
The Quest for Community: Intellectual Disability and the Shifting meaning of Community in Activism
Disability and Community
Fear, Fecklessness and Flapjacks: Imagining Ambridge's Offenders
Flapjacks and Feudalism: Social Mobility and Class in The Archers
Chapter 2 Engaging Students to Improve Retention and Success
Institutional Transformation to Engage a Diverse Student Body
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
