Article navigation
Purpose

This paper aims to investigate the role individuals play in the relationships between open innovation (OI), knowledge use, absorptive capacity (ACAP) and innovation by considering knowledge tacitness.

Design/methodology/approach

This study adopts a mixed method: a quantitative part based on 413 knowledge workers’ responses using structural equation modeling and an inductive multi-case component based on 36 interviews.

Findings

First, the human aspects of the relationship between OI and ACAP depend on the type of external partners involved, whether they are research centers/universities, firms or customers. Second, ACAP fully mediates the relationship between knowledge use and innovativeness. Third, knowledge tacitness moderates the relationship between external stakeholders’ interactions and ACAP such that it is more pronounced when knowledge is tacit.

Practical implications

Firms should adopt a differentiated OI strategy by identifying diverse external stakeholders’ contributions, balancing external engagement with robust internal routines and balancing tacit knowledge for long-term capability building with explicit knowledge for operational efficiency. When investing in OI programs, it is important to maintain the right level of ACAP, as OI alone cannot drive innovation.

Originality/value

Drawing on social exchange theory, this study investigates how individuals share knowledge with external stakeholders through inbound OI, considering ACAP and the tacit nature of knowledge.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Pay-Per-View Access
$41.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options