Concerned with excessive risk-taking, regulators worldwide generally prohibit performance-based fees in pension funds. Presumably, competition can substitute for incentive pay in providing incentives for fund managers to serve their clients’ interests. Using a regulatory experiment from Israel, we compare the performance of three exogenously-given long-term savings schemes: Funds with performance-based fees, facing no competition; funds with assetsunder-management (AUM)-based fees and virtually no competition; and funds with AUM-based fees, operating in a competitive environment. Funds with performance-based fees exhibit the highest risk-adjusted returns without assuming more risk. Competitive pressure is not associated with similar outcomes, suggesting that incentives and competition are not substitutes in the retirement savings industry.
Article navigation
6 June 2017
Research Article|
June 06 2017
Incentive Fees and Competition in Pension Funds: Evidence from a Regulatory Experiment
Assaf Hamdani;
Assaf Hamdani
The Hebrew University and ECGI
Search for other works by this author on:
Eugene Kandel;
Eugene Kandel
Department of Economics, School of Business Administration and the Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality at the Hebrew University, CEPR and ECGI
Search for other works by this author on:
Yevgeny Mugerman;
Yevgeny Mugerman
School of Business Administration, the Hebrew University, and the College of Management
Search for other works by this author on:
Yishay Yafeh
Yishay Yafeh
School of Business Administration, the Hebrew University, CEPR and ECGI
Search for other works by this author on:
*This project was supported by the Israel Science Foundation (Grant No. 890/2013) and by the I-CORE program of the Planning and Budgeting Committee and the Israel Science Foundation (Grant No. 1821/12). Kandel and Yafeh received financial support from the Krueger Center at the Jerusalem School of Business Administration. We thank Doron Avramov, Mark Flannery, Michel Habib, Naomi Hausman, Petri Jylha, Beni Lauterbach, Lavi Schiffenbauer, Clemens Sialm, Michael Weisbach and seminar participants at the Bank of Finland, Bar Ilan University, the BI Business School (Oslo), Cass Business School (London), the Conference on Empirical Legal Studies in Europe (CELSE), the CEPRs First Annual Symposium in Financial Economics (London), ESMT (Berlin), FIRS (Lisbon, 2016), the Hebrew University, Harvard Law School (the JLFA conference), London Business School, the NBER, the SaBusiness School (Oxford), the SEC, Tel Aviv University, Tilburg University, UC Berkeley and the University of Vienna for helpful comments and suggestions. We are also grateful to Ran Cohen, Izik Daniel, Assaf Hasson, Orry Kaz, Yaniv Makdoosi, Eyal Malka, Roma Poberejsky, Evyatar Sadeh, Noa Shukrun and Tomer Yafeh for outstanding research assistance.
Online ISSN: 2380-5013
Print ISSN: 2380-5005
© 2017 A. Hamdani, E. Kandel, Y. Mugerman, and Y. Yafeh
2017
A. Hamdani, E. Kandel, Y. Mugerman, and Y. Yafeh
Licensed re-use rights only
Journal of Law, Finance and Accounting (2017) 2 (1): 49–86.
Citation
Hamdani A, Kandel E, Mugerman Y, Yafeh Y (2017), "Incentive Fees and Competition in Pension Funds: Evidence from a Regulatory Experiment". Journal of Law, Finance and Accounting, Vol. 2 No. 1 pp. 49–86, doi: https://doi.org/10.1561/108.00000015
Download citation file:
3
Views
Suggested Reading
Institutional investors, information asymmetry and stock market liquidity in France
International Journal of Managerial Finance (February,2015)
Prospects for Occupational Pension Funds
Management Research News (April,1985)
The Pension Funds CD‐ROM 2000/2001 (version 2.0)
Online Information Review (October,2001)
Automatic enrolment to pension plans in small organisations: a research agenda
Employee Relations: The International Journal (July,2018)
Pension Funds in the UK — Danger Ahead?
Employee Relations: The International Journal (January,1987)
Related Chapters
Institutional Holdings and Corporate Social Responsibility in the Hospitality Industry
Advances in Hospitality and Leisure
Corporate climate change disclosure practices and regulation: The influence of institutional investors
Institutional Investors’ Power to Change Corporate Behavior: International Perspectives
Institutional investors: Active ownership through nomination committees
Institutional Investors’ Power to Change Corporate Behavior: International Perspectives
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
