The biaxial flexural strength of a concrete panel can be evaluated by two different methods: the centrally loaded round panel test (ASTM C 1150) and the recently proposed biaxial flexure test (BFT). Twenty-six tests, with 13 specimens for each test method, were performed to verify the effect of the different test methods on the biaxial flexural strength of concrete. A finite-element analysis of the specimens of two test methods showed that the biaxial flexure test set-up allows a larger area with a uniform biaxial stress on the bottom surface around the centre of the specimen than the ASTM C 1550 set-up, indicating that the difference in the test results is attributable to the volume effects. The test results showed that the biaxial flexure test method gives a more reliable biaxial flexural strength with a 25% lower coefficient of variation than that from the ASTM C 1550.
Article navigation
December 2012
Research Article|
December 01 2012
Biaxial flexural strength of concrete by two different methods Available to Purchase
Jihwan Kim;
Jihwan Kim
Doctoral Candidate, School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University, South Korea
Search for other works by this author on:
Chongku Yi;
Chongku Yi
Assistant Professor, School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University, South Korea
Search for other works by this author on:
Goangseup Zi
Goangseup Zi
Associate Professor, School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University, South Korea
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Revision Received:
October 26 2011
Revision Requested:
April 17 2012
Accepted:
May 09 2012
Online ISSN: 1751-763X
Print ISSN: 0024-9831
ICE Publishing: All rights reserved
2012
Magazine of Concrete Research (2012) 64 (12): 1057–1065.
Article history
Revision Received:
October 26 2011
Revision Requested:
April 17 2012
Accepted:
May 09 2012
Citation
Kim J, Yi C, Zi G (2012), "Biaxial flexural strength of concrete by two different methods". Magazine of Concrete Research, Vol. 64 No. 12 pp. 1057–1065, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.11.00178
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Editorial
Structural Concrete (September,2007)
2007 reviewers
Structural Concrete (December,2007)
Editorial
Structural Concrete (December,2009)
2009 reviewers
Structural Concrete (December,2009)
Editorial
Structural Concrete (March,2007)
Related Chapters
A new assessment model for shear in reinforced concrete bridges with short anchorage lengths
Bridge Management 5: Inspection, maintenance, assessment and repair: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Bridge Management, organized by the University of Surrey, 11–13 April 2005
COMPARISON BETWEEN MIX PROPORTIONS METHODS ON CONCRETE RESISTANCE TO CHEMICAL DEGRADATION
Repair and Renovation of Concrete Structures: Proceedings of the International Conference held at the University of Dundee, Scotland, UK on 5–6 My 2005
CHLORIDE CONCENTRATION OF 25-YEAR-OLD CONCRETE
Application of Codes, Design and Regulations: Proceedings of the International Conference held at the University of Dundee, Scotland, UK on 5–7 July 2005
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
