Article navigation

The contribution of Portland cement (PC) manufacture to carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere has been well catalogued. The problem is of global relevance because such emissions circulate globally regardless of where they originate.

The pursuit of alternatives to PC is of equal concern (LCCG/CGB, 2022) and within that activity the possible role of alkali-activated cementitious materials (AACMs) is of growing importance. There is active research and product developments, but are these efforts having a significant impact? AACMs or geopolymers have been an option for some 120 years (GCM, 2016; Roy, 1999; Singh et al., 2015; Turner and Collins, 2006) but have never become mainstream within the construction sector. This is because of three significant reservations, despite their good durability, chemical and sulfate resistance:

  • 1.

    the problem of strength/temperature/time restraints of resulting concretes that limits their application, notwithstanding the search for effective ‘activators’ (Luukkonen et al., 2018; Nadoushan and Ramezanjanpour, 2016)

  • 2.

    the availability of suitable precursors on an engineering scale that could compete with PC-based construction

  • 3.

    additional costs associated with precursor chemical acceleration.

In addressing these limitations is the additional problem of transferring new materials and technologies into ongoing best practice. Construction practice and specifications are understandably conservative and new products and techniques are viewed as carrying risk and that in turn can result in insurance issues. Designers and contractors perceive reducing risk by complying with national standards. Unfortunately, at the present time, attempts to develop standards for AACMs have had limited success (BSI, 2016; Provis, 2018).

There appears to be growing emphasis in a partial carbon reduction by developing minimum-PC-content concretes using supplementary cementitious materials in multiple combinations while also having sufficient PC to provide activation and having equivalent mechanical properties. This is not a novel approach and, while resulting in lowering the carbon dioxide footprint, will not eliminate it. A pragmatic half-way house?

The chemistry controlling the dissolution of encased aluminosilicates (Walkley et al., 2017) and their subsequent hydration is key to improving their practical application. Alternative ‘activators’, other than concentrated alkalis, coupled with accelerators holds the key. The patent literature makes mention of sodium sulfate, carbonate and calcium oxide used separately and in combination, but the problem of strength capability limits their application.

In addition, the chosen precursors are also important (Bougara et al., 2010; Kashani et al., 2019) as well as the source and type of ground granulated blast furnace slag (for instance, steel or iron based) are factors, together with the selection of calcined clays (Rakhimov et al., 2018; Sposito et al., 2021) as a global precursor.

A tempting alternative option to current approaches is to use less PC-based concrete in both domestic and industrial buildings and superstructures. Is this a naive suggestion? We can envisage longer lasting, more durable, thermally insulating and high-strength concrete now. However, the transformation of radical change into specifications and the adoption of new materials options is cautious. Perhaps that is how it should be?

One has to consider the ultimate objective behind these developments. Are we seeking to replace PC with an alternative binder that has global capacity? Are we seeking minimum-cement-content concretes having adequate performance set against functional need? Perhaps some designs and the resulting structures are too ambitious. Do they have to be taller, longer, more slender or rapidly built and cheaper? Perhaps we have too many possibilities as a result of wide-ranging research programmes while not taking full advantage of what already exists?

In looking ahead to the future of concrete and related research opportunities, the review by van Damme (2018) may well be a good start.

Bougara
A
,
Lynsdale
C
and
Miestone
NB
(
2010
)
Reactivity and performance of blast furnace slags of differing origin
.
Cement and Concrete Composites
32
(
4
):
319
324
.
BSI
(
2016
) PAS 8820:2016: Construction materials. Alkali-activated cementitious materials and concrete – specification.
BSI
,
London, UK
.
GCM (Global Cement Magazine)
(
2016
) Alkali-activated cements – a clinker free alternative to Portland cement. Global Cement Magazine, September, pp.
19
20
.
Kashani
A
,
Ngo
TD
and
Mendis
P
(
2019
)
The effect of precursors on rheology and self compactness of geopolymer concrete
.
Magazine of Concrete Research
71
(
11
):
557
566
, .
LCCG/GCB (Low Carbon Concrete Group/The Green Construction Board)
(
2022
)
Low Carbon Concrete Routemap
.
The Institution of Civil Engineers
,
London, UK
.
Luukkonen
T
,
Abdollahnejad
Z
,
Yliniemi
J
,
Kinnunen
P
and
Illikainen
M
(
2018
)
One-part alkali-activated materials: a review
.
Cement and Concrete Research
103
:
21
34
.
Nadoushan
MJ
and
Ramezanianpour
AA
(
2016
)
The effect of type and concentration of activators on flow ability and compressive strength of natural pozzolan and slag-based geopolymers
.
Construction and Building Materials
111
:
337
347
.
Provis
JL
(
2018
)
Alkali-activated cements and concretes – durability testing to underpin standardisation
. In
6th International Conference on Durability of Concrete Structures, Leeds, UK
.
Rilem
,
Paris, France
, pp.
16
25
.
Rakhimov
RZ
,
Rakhimova
NR
and
Gaifullin
AR
(
2018
)
Effect of calcined clays on the physical–mechanical properties of hardened Portland cement pastes
.
ZKG Cement Lime Gypsum
12
:
40
47
.
Roy
DM
(
1999
)
Alkali-activated cements: opportunities and challenges
.
Cement and Concrete Research
29
(
2
):
249
254
.
Singh
B
,
Ishwarya
G
,
Gupta
M
and
Bhattacharya
SK
(
2015
)
Geopolymer concrete: a review of some recent developments
.
Construction and Building Materials
85
:
78
90
.
Sposito
R
,
Beuntner
N
and
Thienel
KC
(
2021
)
Rheology, setting and hydration of calcined clay blended cements in interaction with PCE-based superplasticisers
.
Magazine of Concrete Research
73
(
15
):
785
797
, .
Turner
L
and
Collins
F
(
2006
)
Geopolymers: a greener alternative to Portland cement
.
Concrete in Australia
38
(
1
):
49
56
.
van Damme
H
(
2018
)
Concrete material science: past, present and future Innovations
.
Cement and Concrete Research
112
:
5
24
.
Walkley
B
,
Provis
JL
,
Rees
GJ
, et al.
(
2017
)
Molecular structure of alkali-activated cements as determined by solid state 27Al and 27Na MQMAS NMR
. In
37th Cement and Concrete Science Conference, London, UK
.
University College London
,
London, UK
, pp.
19
22
.

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options