A comparative analysis of the chloride and acid resistance of one-part geopolymer and low carbon dioxide concretes is presented, with a focus on their potential to replace traditional systems based on ordinary Portland cement (OPC) in construction. The performance of geopolymer concretes (GPCs) was compared with concretes made with OPC and OPC blended with supplementary cementitious materials (fly ash and slag) under aggressive environmental conditions. The findings revealed that, while GPCs exhibit superior resistance to acid attack, their chloride resistance is highly dependent on the specific precursor materials used. The study also highlights the limitations of using rapid chloride permeability tests at standard voltages for GPCs, suggesting that lower voltage tests at 30 V may offer a more accurate assessment. Overall, the results underscore the need for optimised precursor selection in GPCs to enhance durability and advocate for further research into testing methodologies tailored to these innovative materials.
Article navigation
April 2025
Research Article|
January 15 2025
Comparative analysis of chloride and acid resistance in one-part geopolymer and low carbon concrete
Tran Huyen Vu;
Tran Huyen Vu
Postdoctoral Research Associate, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Australia (corresponding author: tran.vu@uts.edu.au)
Search for other works by this author on:
Yuxuan Yang;
Yuxuan Yang
PhD Candidate & Research Assistant, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Liet Chi Dang;
Liet Chi Dang
Geotechnical Engineer, KCB Australia Pty Ltd, Brisbane, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Vute Sirivivatnanon
Vute Sirivivatnanon
Professor of Concrete Engineering, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
October 07 2024
Accepted:
January 06 2025
Online ISSN: 1751-763X
Print ISSN: 0024-9831
Emerald Publishing Limited: All rights reserved
2025
Magazine of Concrete Research (2025) 77 (7-8): 448–456.
Article history
Received:
October 07 2024
Accepted:
January 06 2025
Citation
Vu TH, Yang Y, Dang LC, Sirivivatnanon V (2025), "Comparative analysis of chloride and acid resistance in one-part geopolymer and low carbon concrete". Magazine of Concrete Research, Vol. 77 No. 7-8 pp. 448–456, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/jmacr.24.00355
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Physical, strength, durability and microstructural analysis of geopolymer concrete: a review
International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation (September,2025)
High-strength geopolymer based engineered cementitious composites (ECC) for sustainable and resilient construction
Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology (August,2024)
Effective combinations of different fiber reinforcements and super-plasticizers for optimal performance of geo-polymer concrete
World Journal of Engineering (October,2024)
Performance of precursor characteristics in the realisation of geopolymer concrete: a review
Magazine of Concrete Research (November,2024)
Transforming cement chemistry for net-zero: role of metakaolin in low-carbon composites
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability (July,2026)
Related Chapters
VIABILITY OF ALTERNATIVE DE-ICING OPERATIONS ON EUROPEAN HIGHWAY BRIDGES
Young Researchers' Forum: Proceedings of the International Conference held at the University of Dundee, Scotland, UK on 7 July 2005
PORTLAND CEMENT BINDERS: SCIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY
Role of Cement Science in Sustainable Development: Proceedings of the International Symposium held at the University of Dundee, Scotland, UK on 3–4 September 2003
DURABILITY OF HIGH PERFORMANCE CONCRETE WITH FLY ASH
Challenges of Concrete Construction: Volume 6, Concrete for Extreme Conditions: Proceedings of the International Conference held at the University of Dundee, Scotland, UK on 9–11 September 2002
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
