This briefing provides an outline comparative study of institutional arbitration rules published since the UNCITRAL Model Law, from the perspective of a practising expert witness. The article compares and contrasts procedures published in civil and common law jurisdictions and their alternative emphases on tribunal appointees and party appointed experts. It also highlights examples of different rules, identifying typical provisions and highlighting any unusual aspects. The regional rules considered in the article will be the current editions of AAA, ACICA, ADCCAC, CIArb, DIAC, HKIAC, ICC, ICE, ICSIC, LCIA, LMAA, SIAC, SCC and UNCITRAL. In addition, the IBA and CIArb rules, as evidential overlays to these regional rules are also considered.
Article navigation
1 December 2015
Brief Report|
October 13 2015
Briefing: The expert witness and international arbitration rules
John Mullen, BSc, MSc, FRICS, FCIArb, FInstCES
John Mullen, BSc, MSc, FRICS, FCIArb, FInstCES
Director
Driver Group plc, London, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
September 01 2015
Accepted:
September 07 2015
Online ISSN: 1751-4312
Print ISSN: 1751-4304
ICE Publishing: All rights reserved
2015
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law (2015) 168 (6): 251–254.
Article history
Received:
September 01 2015
Accepted:
September 07 2015
Citation
Mullen J (2015), "Briefing: The expert witness and international arbitration rules". Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law, Vol. 168 No. 6 pp. 251–254, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/jmapl.15.00043
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
