Surveys show growing use of the third edition of the New Engineering Contract (NEC3) family of contracts. One of the reasons for project owners’ choice of the NEC3 Engineering and Construction Contract is the avoidance of the risk of claims and disputes long after project completion. In several cases not involving NEC3 contracts, UK courts have been presented with difficult questions concerning adjudication after project completion and delayed reference of adjudicated disputes to the applicable final tribunal. This paper critically examines these questions, the courts’ answers to them and their implications for the NEC3 family of contracts. It concludes that the drafters of future editions of the NEC3 Engineering and Construction Contract should consider provisions targeted at: ensuring that the test of awareness for the purposes of the clause 61.3 time-bar is on an objective basis; conclusive evidence clauses that impose a disincentive against seriously delayed challenges to assessment of compensation events and payment; and providing that the decision of an adjudicator becomes finally binding if the dispute decided is not referred to the tribunal within a stated period.
Article navigation
1 April 2016
Research Article|
March 01 2016
Late disputes and the NEC3 Engineering and Construction Contract Available to Purchase
Issaka Ndekugri, BSc, LLB, MSc, PhD, MRICS, MCIOB
Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
July 18 2015
Accepted:
December 16 2015
Online ISSN: 1751-4312
Print ISSN: 1751-4304
ICE Publishing: All rights reserved
2016
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law (2016) 169 (2): 65–76.
Article history
Received:
July 18 2015
Accepted:
December 16 2015
Citation
Ndekugri I (2016), "Late disputes and the NEC3 Engineering and Construction Contract". Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law, Vol. 169 No. 2 pp. 65–76, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/jmapl.15.00037
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Channel Tunnel Rail Link: a contract partnership
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Civil Engineering (May,2003)
Choosing the right contract: a probabilistic model
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Civil Engineering (May,2004)
Legal risks incurred under the application of BIM in Taiwan
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Forensic Engineering (August,2015)
Employer perspective of the new Irish public works contract
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law (August,2008)
Learning from water sector reforms in Europe and Asia
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law (August,2009)
Related Chapters
Sourcing from Multinational Suppliers to Overcome Weak Contracting Institutions and Gain Supply Chain Capabilities
Geography, Location, and Strategy
Updating and Cleaning Out: The “Make or Buy” Decision in Construction Revisited
10th Nordic Conference on Construction Economics and Organization
Exploring the Effects of Discretion, Discrimination, and Oversight on the Inclusiveness of Small Business Contracting
Entrepreneurship for Social Change
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
