Designing for safety (DfS) aims to make designs inherently safer to build, operate and maintain, but any residual risk must be controlled, something essential to realising the benefits of inherently safer designs. Here, a conceptual decision making framework for supporting DfS, developed in conjunction with industry, is introduced. It aims to assist designers in communicating risk, residual risk and actions needed to support DfS, in a way easily understood by non-specialists such as clients and business leaders. The framework proposes a qualitative categorisation for DfS linked to a clear numerical scale, which embraces the complexity of engineering assessment across the full asset life cycle, while using a form of language (numbers) that can be readily understood by all. The framework was empirically explored through an operational design workshop with four engineers leading design and planning teams on the framework. It was found to bring a range of benefits for DfS at the design stage: it provided a structure for the discussion of DfS, made the consideration of DfS objective, gave a new vernacular that improved the collective thought process and made the debate and the resultant design decisions more accessible to non-specialists. The framework provides a tool for supporting the implementation of DfS across the entire life cycle of an asset, enhancing DfS communication within the decision making process from the initial strategic definition stage onwards.
Article navigation
January 2024
Research Article|
December 01 2022
Managing designing for safety: a framework for whole-team decision making and risk control Available to Purchase
Bill Hewlett, MA, CEng, FICE, FIET;
Bill Hewlett, MA, CEng, FICE, FIET
Director
Bill Hewlett Associates Limited, Sevenoaks, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Fred Sherratt, PhD, MCIOB, CBuildE, MCABE, AMICE;
Nemesis V, Oswestry, UK
(corresponding author: fred@nemesisv.co.uk)
Search for other works by this author on:
Vikki Edmondson, PhD, MEng, CEng, FICE, MIStructE, FCIHT, FIHE, FCMI, CMgr
Vikki Edmondson, PhD, MEng, CEng, FICE, MIStructE, FCIHT, FIHE, FCMI, CMgr
Assistant Professor
Department of Mechanical and Construction Engineering, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
(corresponding author: fred@nemesisv.co.uk)
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
June 02 2022
Accepted:
November 10 2022
Online ISSN: 1751-4312
Print ISSN: 1751-4304
Emerald Publishing Limited: All rights reserved
2024
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law (2024) 177 (1): 15–26.
Article history
Received:
June 02 2022
Accepted:
November 10 2022
Citation
Hewlett B, Sherratt F, Edmondson V (2024), "Managing designing for safety: a framework for whole-team decision making and risk control". Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law, Vol. 177 No. 1 pp. 15–26, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/jmapl.22.00030
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
The ‘life of an issue’ and approaches to its control
Journal of Communication Management (March,2000)
A Secure and Safer Workplace
Facilities (May,1999)
Commercial bank credit risk management based on grey incidence analysis
Grey Systems: Theory and Application (October,2012)
The role of appearance concern in responses to intervention to reduce skin cancer risk
Health Education (April,2002)
How Safe Is Safe Enough? Leadership, Safety and Risk Management
Leadership & Organization Development Journal (July,2004)
Related Chapters
How Well Do Banks Manage Their Credit Risk? A Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Approach
Advances in Pacific Basin Business, Economics and Finance
What is a Professional Civil Engineer
Initial Professional Development for Civil Engineers
Quantifying risk
Landslide Risk Assessment
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
