Examines Secretary of War Elihu Root’s 1903 reorganization of the US Army. Prior to Root, the Army suffered major organizational problems, including no central authority and an ambiguous chain‐of‐command. Post‐Civil War antimilitary sentiment had left the Army poorly funded, undermanned and barely capable of waging war on the Indians. In 1898, the ineptly fought Spanish‐American War highlighted Army deficiencies. Root’s modernization created the Chief of Staff, a senior general who reported to the Secretary of War, controlled the previously independent bureaus, prepared war plans and coordinated military activities with the Navy. Root also increased Army manpower and funding, reformed state militia into what is now the National Guard, and overhauled military training. Root laid the foundation for the complex defense management of the present day. His doctrine of civilian supremacy and concept of clear command relationships are as sound now as in 1903.
Article navigation
1 March 1998
Review Article|
March 01 1998
Civilian management of the military: Elihu Root and the 1903 reorganization of the army general staff Available to Purchase
Richard D. White
Richard D. White
Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-776X
Print ISSN: 1355-252X
© MCB UP Limited
1998
Journal of Management History (Archive) (1998) 4 (1): 43–59.
Citation
White RD (1998), "Civilian management of the military: Elihu Root and the 1903 reorganization of the army general staff ". Journal of Management History (Archive), Vol. 4 No. 1 pp. 43–59, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/13552529810369614
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Jane’s Defense Equipment Library
Electronic Resources Review (September,1997)
Marching to the same beat: defence and the future of Europe
Foresight (February,2001)
Beyond moral disarmament
European Business Review (August,2000)
Defence conversion: surviving (and prospering) in the 1990s
Work Study (April,1997)
Nature or nurture? Turning to the military in the leadership debate
Strategic Direction (September,2002)
Related Chapters
No Mission Too Difficult: Army Units within Exponentially Complex Multiteam Systems The view, opinions, and/or findings contained in this report (chapter) are those of the author(s) and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy, or decision.
Pushing the Boundaries: Multiteam Systems in Research and Practice
Measuring Job Performance in the Army: Insights from Evidence on Civilian Stress and Health
Occupational Stress and Well-Being in Military Contexts
Living Traditions in the Swiss Armed Forces
New Wars, New Militaries, New Soldiers: Conflicts, the Armed Forces and the Soldierly Subject
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
