Article navigation
Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to highlight criticism of attempts to impose regulations on hawala and other informal value transfer systems (IVTSs), in light of their importance in the lives of people in the most vulnerable sectors of global society.

Design/methodology/approach

Review of scholarly, public‐policy, and legal literature on hawala and other IVTSs.

Findings

Most attempts to regulate hawala and other IVTSs seem redundant of existing regimes, or, worse, unreasonably punitive when their social utility is considered.

Originality/value

A contribution to the debate on the supposed need to regulate hawala and other IVTSs favored by the poorest and most vulnerable sectors of global society.

You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options